Peterson: White House Veto Of Farm Bill 'Political Suicide'

Updated: February 4, 2011 | 1:53 p.m.
April 30, 2008

House Agriculture Chairman Collin Peterson said today that the House and the Senate intend to pass a reform-oriented farm bill conference report with substantial limits on subsidy payments, and predicted that a White House veto would be "political suicide" because Congress will have the votes to override it. Key negotiators reached agreement on the content of the farm bill Tuesday. Senate Agriculture Chairman Tom Harkin said he is waiting for CBO scores for some measures, but that he would like to hold a formal conference later today or Thursday at the latest. Peterson and Harkin both said they hope to take the farm bill to the floor next week but that they will need a two-week extension of the 2002 farm bill to get it passed and for Bush to sign it.

Speaking to the National Association of Farm Broadcasters, Peterson remarked that when Agriculture Secretary Schafer and Deputy Secretary Chuck Conner met with key negotiators, they said they had no authority to negotiate changes in the demands the administration presented Feb. 29. "That's a hell of a way to operate," Peterson said. "We're going to move ahead. If [Bush] doesn't sign it, we're going to override." Harkin also said it was clear Schafer and Conner did not have negotiating authority.

Senate Agriculture ranking member Saxby Chambliss told the farm broadcasters he intends to present the Senate with a bill that will garner a veto-proof majority. "A big vote on the Senate side ... will strongly encourage [Bush] to accept it," he said. Chambliss has requested a meeting for Republican senators with Bush today or Thursday to discuss the farm bill, but said the White House has not given them an appointment. "You'd think because they are our guys down at the White House they'd give us an immediate response," Chambliss said. House Agriculture ranking member Bob Goodlatte said believes he will support the bill when all the details are worked out and that he is requesting a White House meeting for House Republicans.

But White House Press Secretary Dana Perino denied today that the White House is refusing to meet with Republican senators on the bill. She said administration and congressional officials have each had "access to share their views both ways," including during a visit to Capitol Hill Tuesday by Schaefer. Perino said that "it is premature to say that anything is final" on the farm bill and that the White House was continuing to talk to lawmakers about the measure.

Harkin confirmed today that negotiators agreed on payment limits for nonfarmers and farmers based on their adjusted gross income. For nonfarmers, subsidies would be banned in 2009 if their income is $750,000. The cap falls to $650,000 in 2010 and to $500,000 in 2011. Farmers with incomes up to $950,000 would still be able to get subsidies, but for every $100,000 in income above that, they would lose 10 percent of their direct payments. The limit on the amount of direct payments a farmer could get would rise to $50,000. Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad said the payment limits would also apply to conservation programs.

This article appears in the May 3, 2008, edition of National Journal Daily.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Both Parties Face Tricky Balancing Act at IRS Hearings" -- Even amid crisis and scandal, the two parties remain as divided as ever—especially when it comes to finding solutions.That much should be evident on Friday morning when the top Democratic and Republican tax writers gather for the first in a series of hearings about problems with the Internal Revenue Service’s screenings of tax-exempt advocacy groups.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »