Obamacare at Age 3: Still Too Young for Prognosis

Updated: March 20, 2013 | 2:45 p.m.
March 19, 2013 | 9:30 p.m.

Dr. Hamsakumari Ramasubramaniam examines a patient at Camillus Health Concern, Wednesday, June 27, 2012, in Miami. (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky)

The Affordable Care Act, the Obama administration’s signature attempt to broadly transform the health care system, marks its third anniversary this weekend. And it is still very much a toddler.

Advocates and opponents have been seizing on the anniversary to offer their assessments of the law. On Monday, the Health and Human Services Department took credit for the more than 100 million Americans who have received at least one free preventive health service because of the law. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius started a Twitter stream (@acaturns3) where advocates can cheer. Meanwhile, critics have held several events to highlight the law’s potential costs to businesses and insurance purchasers.

Yet experts say it’s much too early to know how well the Affordable Care Act is meeting its dual goals of expanding health insurance coverage and reducing the growth of health care prices are working in practice. “It will not be fair to evaluate this law at all in 2014,” said MIT economics professor Jonathan Gruber, one of its architects.

Some provisions, such as the requirement that insurers cover preventive care, are in place. But most major components won’t kick in until next year, and there is much heavy lifting to be done between now and then. Here are some key elements yet to come.

Insurance Exchanges. The state marketplaces where individuals and small businesses must buy insurance are not yet built and stocked with products in most states. The prices of these products are also unknown.

Medicaid. The Supreme Court’s decision upholding the law allows the states to decide whether to expand Medicaid coverage to a large pool of their low-income residents. Those decisions are still being debated, as governors negotiate with HHS and their legislatures, and wrestle with the politics of expansion.

Employer Mandate. The law will require all large employers to offer health coverage or pay a fine. Businesses are still waiting for key regulations and developing strategies to manage the costs of the options. Will employers drop coverage and dump workers on the exchanges? Will they cut back on employee hours or the size of their workforces? Too soon to tell.

Medicare. Will new payment systems, designed to reward quality health care over quantities of services, really work? Most are in their infancy. Though lots of providers have signed up for various pilot programs, it will take years to know whether the models succeed in lowering costs. The early signs are good. Medicare has grown more slowly than ever over the past three years. But some worry that the shift may be more about the weak economy than health policy.

Outreach. Even if the systems are perfect, they will rely on uninsured Americans learning about the new health care benefits and signing up. Early polling suggests this population will need a lot of education about the options and requirements. Sophisticated groups are working on this, but it’s a big and complex challenge.

This article appears in the March 20, 2013, edition of National Journal Daily.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Both Parties Face Tricky Balancing Act at IRS Hearings" -- Even amid crisis and scandal, the two parties remain as divided as ever—especially when it comes to finding solutions.That much should be evident on Friday morning when the top Democratic and Republican tax writers gather for the first in a series of hearings about problems with the Internal Revenue Service’s screenings of tax-exempt advocacy groups.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

7:05 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

11:03 a.m.

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »