Moran Seeks To Restore Direct Payment Cuts In Farm Deal

Updated: February 8, 2011 | 11:13 a.m.
May 1, 2008

When House-Senate farm bill conferees convene, possibly today, Rep. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., is preparing to offer a highly controversial amendment to trim the increases in target prices and loan rates for commodities and use the money to eliminate any cut in the direct payments that farmers get whether prices are high or low.

Scheduling for a farm bill conference is on hold until CBO completes its scoring of the latest provisions of the negotiators' agreement, but Senate Agriculture Chairman Tom Harkin intends to hold one this week, a Harkin spokeswoman said Wednesday.

The spokeswoman also said Senate leaders were consulting members to see if any objections would be raised to a two-week extension of the 2002 farm bill. Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, who objected to the last two extensions until Harkin explained the progress that had been made, said on the Senate floor late Wednesday he does not plan to object to this extension. Craig praised the conferees for making "great progress."

The latest farm bill agreement would trim the $5.2 billion direct payments program by a total of $313 million over three years. The bill also raises target prices and loan rates for most crops grown in northern states such as wheat, soybeans and canola.

Moran told the National Association of Farm Broadcasters Wednesday he is "advocating for the preservation of direct payments."

During periods such as now when commodity prices and production costs are high, direct payments are more helpful than the target prices and loan deficiency payments, which are triggered when prices drop, Moran said.

He noted that direct payments, which farmers are allowed to use to plant any crop except fruits and vegetables, are considered most compliant with World Trade Organization rules that subsidies do not distort production toward any crop.

The American Farm Bureau Federation is supporting Moran's amendment, but the National Farmers Union, the American Soybean Association, the National Barley Growers Association, the National Sunflower Association and the U.S. Canola Association oppose.

Farm Bureau President Bob Stallman said in a letter to conferees that producers are likely to get more benefits from direct payments because CBO estimates that prices of many commodities will remain high over the coming years, which would mean countercyclical farm programs will not be triggered.

The opposing groups said in their letter to conferees that Moran's amendment would upset the "delicate balance" that has been struck in the farm bill's programs.

The new target prices and loan rates "reconcile disparities in marketing loan and target price levels between various commodities that have distorted planting decisions under the 2002 farm bill and will provide more equitable income support to producers of these commodities during periods of low prices, compared to producers of other crops," they said.

Moran's plan has raised the ire of Democrats. Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D., said if Moran offers his amendment he should expect amendments "en masse" that he will not like.

"I'm as upset by Moran as anybody. He is on my list. He doesn't need to go through all these theatrics on the farm bill," House Agriculture Chairman Collin Peterson said.

Meanwhile, details of the agreement began to leak out. A Senate aide said the dairy promotion assessment on imported dairy products that was in the House bill was not included in the final version.

The negotiators' agreement on farm subsidy payment limits announced Wednesday produced negative comments from the Bush administration and a key reform advocate.

"This plan would result in continuation of farm subsidy payments to individuals with extremely high incomes. This is not reform and does not move Congress closer to a farm bill that the president would sign," Deputy Agriculture Secretary Chuck Conner said in a statement.

Ferd Hoefner of the Sustainable Agriculture Coalition said: "This is an anti-reform bill. It is not even close to the same ballpark as the Bush proposal. If they sign off on this, the White House will have sold reform down the river."

Senate Agriculture ranking member Saxby Chambliss told the farm broadcasters that under the new payment limits his Georgia farmers "are not going to be fine, but they're going to be OK."

This article appears in the May 3, 2008, edition of National Journal Daily.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Both Parties Face Tricky Balancing Act at IRS Hearings" -- Even amid crisis and scandal, the two parties remain as divided as ever—especially when it comes to finding solutions.That much should be evident on Friday morning when the top Democratic and Republican tax writers gather for the first in a series of hearings about problems with the Internal Revenue Service’s screenings of tax-exempt advocacy groups.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »