Grover Norquist: George W. Bush Said He Would Have Backed Cliff Deal

Updated: February 25, 2013 | 11:13 p.m.
February 25, 2013 | 9:10 p.m.

Grover Norquist (Richard A. Bloom) ()

Former President George W. Bush told Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., that he would have supported the fiscal-cliff deal that McConnell struck with Vice President Joe Biden late last year, antitax advocate Grover Norquist told National Journal Daily on Monday.

“Bush said, ‘Hey, I would have cut that deal back [in 2001]. I would have been happy with that back then,’ ” said Norquist, citing a phone conversation he said occurred between McConnell and Bush shortly after Congress passed the fiscal-cliff deal this year.

McConnell’s office would not verify that the phone call occurred. “We don’t confirm Senator McConnell’s private conversations,” said spokesman John Ashbrook.

Bush’s reported endorsement of the McConnell-Biden fiscal-cliff deal is significant because the legislation made permanent most of the temporary tax cuts Bush initiated as president in 2001.

The deal, which Congress passed on New Year’s Day, made permanent the tax cuts for everyone but the wealthiest households (those that make more than $450,000 a year) and individuals (those who make more than $400,000).

Shortly after the legislation passed, the nonpartisan Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reported that the measure made permanent 82 percent of Bush’s tax cuts. In fact, some publications reported that the real winner in the fiscal-cliff deal was President Obama’s predecessor.

According to Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform, the influential conservative group that has influenced Republicans on opposing tax increases, Bush told McConnell that if it had been 2001, he would have cut a deal that made permanent the tax cuts on everyone below the $450,000 and $400,000 levels and raised taxes on the richest.

“Making permanent 85 percent of something you only have temporarily is a good deal,” Norquist said. “Instead, what [the Bush administration] got was eight temporary years.”

This article appears in the Feb. 26, 2013, edition of National Journal Daily as Norquist: Bush Would Have Cut Fiscal-Cliff Deal.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Both Parties Face Tricky Balancing Act at IRS Hearings" -- Even amid crisis and scandal, the two parties remain as divided as ever—especially when it comes to finding solutions.That much should be evident on Friday morning when the top Democratic and Republican tax writers gather for the first in a series of hearings about problems with the Internal Revenue Service’s screenings of tax-exempt advocacy groups.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »