Farm Bill Conferees Close In On Agreement, Fear Veto ...

Updated: February 4, 2011 | 2:01 p.m.
May 2, 2008

House and Senate farm bill conferees finalized all but a handful of the most controversial issues early today amid fresh concern that President Bush will veto the bill. Senate Agriculture Chairman Tom Harkin, who chairs the conference, said Agriculture committee staffs and principal negotiators would work through the weekend to resolve outstanding issues with the White House, but that there would be limits to what Congress could do. Harkin added the conference would not convene again before Tuesday at 1 p.m. Bush is likely to sign a two-week extension of the 2002 farm bill through May 16 passed Thursday by the House and Senate. A one-week extension of the 2002 bill expires today.

Senate Agriculture ranking member Saxby Chambliss acknowledged in an interview after the conference ended early this morning that Vice President Cheney had called him Wednesday night and told him he had been "tasked to call you and tell you that the president is not going to sign your bill." Chambliss told Cheney he had then requested a meeting with the president, but had not received a response. But after a Thursday morning conversation with White House Chief of Staff Bolten, Chambliss said, he was invited to lunch, where he had "a good conversation with the president" and that "there's been somewhat of a change of the heart. The president is not committed to vetoing the bill." The Georgia Republican added: "There was a point when the president didn't think we could get a bill. Now the White House realizes they are going to get a bill." Regarding the specifics of the bill, Chambliss declined to go into detail as to what he discussed with Bush.

Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad shed more light, however, on potential White House concerns. He said late Thursday that Republicans told him the administration's top issues are restricting farmers' ownership in grain after they receive farm subsidies; keeping out of the bill a measure to stop states from using private firms for initial screening of food stamp applicants; allowing the U.S. government to spend up to 25 percent of food aid money on purchases from other countries; and placing a cap on the adjusted gross income of farmers and nonfarmers who can receive farm subsidies. Agriculture Deputy Secretary Chuck Conner and other officials were present throughout the conference, but were not asked any questions. Late Thursday evening, Conner issued a statement that the president "wants to sign a farm bill that meets his criteria. If sent to him without meeting his criteria, he would be forced to veto the bill. We encourage the conferees to produce a bill which will gain his signature by reducing the cost and implementing real reform." Conner's statement renewed Democratic fears that Bush will veto the bill no matter how it is written, but House Agriculture ranking member Bob Goodlatte, who met with the president late Wednesday, and Chambliss have both said they would continue to work with the administration.

This article appears in the May 3, 2008, edition of National Journal Daily.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Both Parties Face Tricky Balancing Act at IRS Hearings" -- Even amid crisis and scandal, the two parties remain as divided as ever—especially when it comes to finding solutions.That much should be evident on Friday morning when the top Democratic and Republican tax writers gather for the first in a series of hearings about problems with the Internal Revenue Service’s screenings of tax-exempt advocacy groups.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »