Early Reviews of Obama’s Outreach Are Positive

Updated: March 12, 2013 | 10:01 p.m.
March 12, 2013 | 9:45 p.m.

Obama hits the Hill, with Senate Doorkeeper Terry Gainer. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) ()

Whether President Obama’s get-together on Tuesday with Senate Democrats and other planned Capitol Hill visits with Republicans and Democrats reflect a genuine determination to listen, engage, and promote compromise—or whether they are mere theater—the early reviews seem positive.

However, just how far such a face-to-face approach can go toward actually loosening partisan gridlock, or even paving the way to a fiscal “grand bargain,” is something few are ready to predict.

“Nothing happens if you don’t show up. But just showing up isn’t enough,” offered one House Republican leadership aide. “In the end, you’ve got to put actions behind what you’re doing.”

More publicly, though, Republicans were still casting the presidential overtures as a step forward. “We welcome it,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

Following last week’s closed-door dinner with a group of Senate Republicans, Obama is set to meet with House Republicans on Wednesday as well as with Senate Republicans and House Democrats in separate meetings on Thursday.

“I think having more of that, rather than less of that, is a good idea,” McConnell said. But he also underscored that the president will be requesting another debt-ceiling increase this summer, and that should generate new discussion of “solving finally our huge deficit and debt problem.”

McConnell said changes to “the entitlement side” have to be made, and that “we’re hopeful that finally he will be willing to step up with us and solve that.”

Meanwhile, a senior administration official said Tuesday that while it is difficult to assess how well these meetings are going after only a week, the early returns appear to be good. “You’ve seen a number of Republicans say that the president has been constructive, and that there is space for further talk and possible compromise,” the aide said.

As for Obama’s meetings with Democrats, the administration sees those as less critical, given that he is on good terms with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. The aide downplayed the notion that there may be Democratic concern over what compromises Obama might be willing to make.

Emerging from Tuesday’s meeting between Obama and Senate Democrats, Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., said, “The president is taking a very pragmatic approach.” He said the discussion was not just about the budget or longer-term fiscal issues. “Immigration was a big thing, gun control,” he said.

“We’re going to look at everything we can get done.... We’re not going to be, as Democrats, changing the core values,” Manchin said. “That’s not going to happen.”

As if to bring back down to earth some of the new spirit from the Obama outreach to the Hill, Reid emerged from the same meeting to say that—unexpectedly—a Republican hold had just been placed on a Senate version of a bill to fund the government for another six months, even amid “all of this cheering and yelling about this bipartisan bill.”

Reid also lashed out at the proposed fiscal 2014 budget from House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis. He said that bill shows “a revealing contrast” with what he calls efforts in the Senate to advance bipartisan compromise and is “even more extreme than the propaganda that we have seen in the past.”

During his meeting with Senate Democrats, Obama was pressed about the possibility that he might agree to entitlement cuts to reach a deficit bargain. The president offered that he remains open to a less-generous formula for inflation adjustments to Social Security and other programs, known as “chained CPI,” as part of a deal.

But Reid seemed pessimistic about the chances of GOP willingness to compromise.

“You know what, here is the issue,” Reid said. He noted that Obama has in the past had personal negotiations involving Vice President Joe Biden with House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio and other top Republicans, adding that they have “indicated they would be willing to do certain things.” But in the end, Reid said, “the Republicans never get further than that.”

At the same time, Reid said Republicans “take these things that are talked about in abstract and say that’s what we’ve agreed to. We haven’t agreed to any of that.”

This article appears in the March 13, 2013, edition of National Journal Daily as Obama Outreach Plays Well So Far On Capitol Hill.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Lawyer: IRS Witness Will Decline to Testify" -- High drama is expected at the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday as a top IRS official has been subpoenaed to appear, despite signaling her intention to invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to testify.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama Pushes to Accommodate, Not Protect, Freedom of the Press

May 21, 2013
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena of AP phone logs begs questions about Obama’s attitude toward the First Amendment and government scrutiny.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

10:43 p.m.

Latest Response by Gabriel Roth: But do we not drive to save time?

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:49 p.m.

Latest Response by Dave McCurdy: Natural Gas Market Will Find Balance

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

4:24 p.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: We Need a New Policy for a New Day

More Expert Opinions »