ENERGY

Democrats Press Clinton on Oil Sands Pipeline

Updated: October 5, 2011 | 11:58 a.m.
October 4, 2011 | 9:23 p.m.

Piping hot: Protesters in Nebraska last week. (Nati Harnik/AP)

House Democrats are urging Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to oppose the controversial Keystone XL oil sands pipeline in light of recently uncovered e-mails that show what they say is an overly friendly relationship between a State Department official and a lobbyist for TransCanada, the company seeking to build the pipeline.

“Rather than acting as fair arbiters of TransCanada’s application to build a massive pipeline across environmentally sensitive areas of the United States, State Department officials appear to have acted as little more than cheerleaders for the company’s bid,” states a letter written by Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., which was circulating among other House Democratic offices on Tuesday to gather more signatures.

The State Department has said it will decide by the end of the year whether the 1,700-mile, $7 billion Keystone XL pipeline project is in the national interest. If it moves forward, it could eventually bring 700,000 barrels of tar-sands oil daily from Canada to Texas. Environmental groups and many congressional Democrats oppose the project because of concerns about the extraction and production of oil sands using processes they say are more detrimental to the environment than conventional oil drilling, emitting more greenhouse gases and damaging land around the extraction area.

The e-mails the House Democrats reference in the letter were obtained by Friends of the Earth through a Freedom of Information Act request.

The group pointed to an e-mail exchange between State Department employee Marja Verloop and TransCanada lobbyist Paul Elliott, in which Verloop lauds Elliot—“Go Paul!”—for securing the support of Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., for the project. Verloop runs energy and environmental issues at the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa.

The e-mails “display an alarmingly close relationship between State Department officials overseeing the process and TransCanada representatives,” the Democrats’ letter states.

This article appears in the Oct. 5, 2011, edition of National Journal Daily.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "White House Threatens Veto as House Takes Up Farm Bill " -- "The House is scheduled to begin debate on the farm bill on Tuesday with the knowledge that if the House version makes it through Congress and goes to the White House, President Obama’s senior advisers will recommend that he veto it."

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

Why Democrats Are Already Jumping Aboard the Hillary Clinton Bandwagon

1:57 p.m.
Claire McCaskill's endorsement was a bow to reality: Democrats don't want to challenge Clinton in 2016.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

No Guarantee of a GOP Senate Majority

June 17, 2013
The disproportionate exposure for the chamber’s Democrats is very clear. But can Republicans capitalize on their opportunities?
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Why We Lack Good Privacy Guidelines

June 13, 2013
Technology innovations have served to strip away privacy. They could also be the key to restoring it.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Hands-Free Won't Cut It

3:22 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Consider the Opportunity Before Us

Energy Experts

What's the Future of Electric Cars?

June 17, 2013

Latest Response by Phyllis Cuttino: TBD

Energy Experts

What's the Future of Electric Cars?

June 14, 2013

Latest Response by Brigham McCown: Electric Cars and Their Dirty Secret

More Expert Opinions »