Democratic Senate Hopefuls Aim to Edge Obama

Updated: September 5, 2012 | 5:07 p.m.
September 5, 2012 | 5:05 p.m.

Is he able? Kaine (Ralf-Finn Hestoft)

For the first time in three election cycles, the political landscape appears calm. Neither Democrats nor Republicans look poised to ride a wave to major wins this fall. For Democrats, who cling to a narrow Senate majority, the chances of keeping the gavel hinge on a number of states where GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney will win this year. Democrats must appeal to an increasingly rare species: the crossover voter, who considers candidates across party lines rather than sticking with one side straight down the ballot. Democrats’ chances, in other words, will depend on their Senate candidates’ ability to run ahead of President Obama.

In this hyper-partisan atmosphere, the number of true swing voters has diminished. But for Senate candidates who will raise and spend millions of dollars, bolstered by millions more in outside spending, it’s still possible to build an independent image.

“House races have less of a capacity to separate themselves from the dynamics … of the national environment, whether there’s a presidential race or not,” said Guy Cecil, executive director of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. “There’s more capacity for our candidates to make the election a choice between two people.”

In some cases, a Democratic Senate candidate need run only a few percentage points ahead. Even if Obama loses nationally, he is likely to keep the margins close in Virginia. Tim Kaine, the former governor, only needs to run ahead of Obama by a few points to build a winning coalition there. The same is true for Democratic Sens. Sherrod Brown of Ohio and Bill Nelson of Florida.

In all three states, it is easier to imagine a voter—a Dixiecrat in the Florida Panhandle, a suburban woman in Richmond, or a white working-class voter along the Ohio-West Virginia border—who picks Romney and the Democratic Senate nominee than it is to consider a voter who picks Obama and the Republican Senate candidate.

Other Democratic candidates face a much tougher lift. Obama is likely to lose Missouri by a wider margin than he did in 2008, and Romney will likely win North Dakota and Montana by double digits. So Sens. Claire McCaskill of Missouri and Jon Tester of Montana and former North Dakota Attorney General Heidi Heitkamp all must outperform Obama by 5, 10, or as many as 20 percentage points to win.

“We are preparing our races to be a choice between the two folks on the ballot,” Cecil said on Tuesday. “We don’t spend a lot of time paying attention to where the president’s individual numbers are in a state, because we have very limited impact on how those are going to change.”

Rob Jesmer, Cecil’s counterpart at the National Republican Senatorial Committee, sees only a small number of crossover voters, especially in hotly contested states where Obama and Romney are generating a lot of advertising. “This is going to be a parliamentary election. [The] overwhelming majority of people in Ohio are going to vote for Romney and [Republican state Treasurer Josh] Mandel, or [vote for] Obama and Brown,” Jesmer said.

At a Democratic convention event hosted by National Journal, The Atlantic, and CBS News on Wednesday, Cecil identified a few states—Indiana, Missouri, Virginia—where white, suburban female voters could tip votes in favor of Democratic candidates. He also said that the party is focusing on “maximizing the vote among African-Americans and continuing growth with Hispanics.”

Ironically, Democrats are having a harder time in states where Obama will be the strongest. Internal polling shows Massachusetts candidate Elizabeth Warren tied or slightly behind Sen. Scott Brown, Cecil said. Wisconsin Rep. Tammy Baldwin is running behind former GOP Gov. Tommy Thompson by high-single-digits, according to two independent surveys. And Republicans see an emerging prospect in Connecticut, where polling shows a tight race between former WWE executive Linda McMahon and Democratic Rep. Chris Murphy, even though Obama is expected to win the state by a wide margin.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "As Focus Continues on IRS Scandal, Congress Tackles Keystone Pipeline, Farm Bill" -- Amid continued focus on the Internal Revenue Service and other controversies that have hit the Obama administration, lawmakers this week will take up items that sputtered in the last Congress, with the House set to address the Keystone XL pipeline again and the Senate starting debate on its farm bill.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Latest Congress News
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

8:23 p.m.

Latest Response by William O'Keefe: LNG: A Rising Tide Does Raise All Boats

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

6:39 p.m.

Latest Response by Laura Barrett: P3s Must Be Accountable to Public

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

5:16 p.m.

Latest Response by Marlo Lewis: Central Planning: Bad Export Policy

More Expert Opinions »