Connecticut Lawmaker Admonishes Spielberg Over Errors on ‘Lincoln’ Anti-Slavery Votes

Updated: February 5, 2013 | 8:44 p.m.
February 5, 2013 | 8:38 p.m.

This image released by DreamWorks II Distribution Co., LLC and Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation shows Sally Field and Daniel Day-Lewis appear in a scene from "Lincoln." (AP Photo/DreamWorks) ()

Ahead of the Academy Awards later this month, Rep. Joe Courtney, D-Conn., on Tuesday sent a letter to Lincoln director Steven Spielberg asking him to correct what he says is an inaccuracy in the Oscar-nominated film depicting the Nutmeg State as being on the wrong side of the historic fight over slavery.

“I understand that artistic license will be taken and that some facts may be blurred to make a story more compelling on the big screen, but placing the state of Connecticut on the wrong side of the historic and divisive fight over slavery is a distortion of easily verifiable facts and an inaccuracy that should be acknowledged, and if possible, corrected before Lincoln is released on DVD,” Courtney wrote to Spielberg.

The movie has been nominated for 12 Oscars, including Best Picture.

Courtney did underscore in his letter that he enjoyed the film. “After finally sitting down to watch your Academy Award-nominated film, Lincoln, I can say unequivocally that the rave reviews are justified: Daniel Day-Lewis is tremendous, the story is compelling and consuming, and the cinematography is beautiful,” he wrote.

But as for the historical accuracy of the film’s moving conclusion?

“Well, that is a different story,” Courtney wrote.

“As a member of Congress from Connecticut, I was on the edge of my seat during the roll-call vote on the ratification of the 13th Amendment outlawing slavery. But when two of three members of the Nutmeg State’s House delegation voted to uphold slavery, I could not believe my own eyes and ears,” he wrote. “How could congressmen from Connecticut—a state that supported President Lincoln and lost thousands of her sons fighting against slavery on the Union side of the Civil War—have been on the wrong side of history?”

But Courtney added that after “some digging and a check of the Congressional Record from January 31, 1865, I learned that in fact, Connecticut’s entire congressional delegation, including four members of the House of Representatives—Augustus Brandegee of New London, James English of New Haven, Henry Deming of Colchester, and John Henry Hubbard of Salisbury—all voted to abolish slavery.”

The lawmaker said he allows that in many movies—such as Spielberg’s own E.T.—suspending disbelief is part of the cinematic experience and is critical to enjoying the film.

“But in a movie based on significant real-life events—particularly a movie about a seminal moment in American history so closely associated with Doris Kearns Goodwin and her book, Team of Rivals—accuracy is paramount,” he wrote.

A call placed Tuesday night to Spielberg’s DreamWorks Studios led to a referral to a publicist, who did not immediately respond to an e-mail.

This article appears in the Feb. 6, 2013, edition of National Journal Daily as Courtney: Spielberg Smeared Connecticut in ‘Lincoln’.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Both Parties Face Tricky Balancing Act at IRS Hearings" -- Even amid crisis and scandal, the two parties remain as divided as ever—especially when it comes to finding solutions.That much should be evident on Friday morning when the top Democratic and Republican tax writers gather for the first in a series of hearings about problems with the Internal Revenue Service’s screenings of tax-exempt advocacy groups.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »