ENERGY

Chu Says Japan Crisis May Top Three Mile Island

Updated: March 16, 2011 | 12:41 p.m.
March 16, 2011 | 11:44 a.m.

THREE MILE ISLAND, UNITED STATES: View the site of the Three Mile Island nuclear plant 28 March 1979. The Governor of Pennsylvania ordered the evacuation of the site after nuclear activity was detected following an accident at the Nuclear plant (background). (Photo credit should read AFP/AFP/Getty Images) (AFP/AFP/Getty Images)

Energy Secretary Steven Chu told Congress that the explosions at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear-power plant “actually appear to be more serious than Three Mile Island,” referring to the 1979 meltdown near Harrisburg, Pa., that led to a three-decade freeze on nuclear-plant construction in the U.S.

“To what extent [it’s worse], we don’t know,” he said on Wednesday at a hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

He noted that during the Three Mile Island meltdown, the plant’s radiation containment systems remained intact so that even people within close proximity to the plant were not exposed to dangerous levels of radiation, unlike the 1986 meltdown of the Chernobyl plant in the Soviet Union. The meltdown and damage of containment systems of Chernobyl, the world’s worst nuclear disaster, led to widespread health and environmental damage from radiation exposure.    

Chu said he was hesitant to predict whether the Japanese power plant’s containment system would hold, or what the repercussions might be.  

“We think there is a partial meltdown,” he said.  “We hear conflicting reports about several reactors that are at risk. I do not want to speculate about what will happen, but we are monitoring very closely.”

Pressed by Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, as to what the Obama administration’s position on new U.S. nuclear power plants will be going forward, Chu responded cautiously.

“We have to look very closely at what’s happened in Japan…. It would be premature to say anything other than that we would watch closely to see what we can learn.”

Barton pressed: “Does the president support new nuclear-power-plant construction in the United States?”

The Energy Department’s current budget request to Congress includes $36 billion in new loan guarantees for construction of nuclear-power plants.   

“The present budget is what it is; it includes nuclear loan guarantees to pay for small modular nuke reactors,” Chu said.

“Do you want the president to continue to support $36 billion in loan guarantees [for] those plants?” Barton asked.

Chu responded simply, “Yes.”

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Both Parties Face Tricky Balancing Act at IRS Hearings" -- Even amid crisis and scandal, the two parties remain as divided as ever—especially when it comes to finding solutions.That much should be evident on Friday morning when the top Democratic and Republican tax writers gather for the first in a series of hearings about problems with the Internal Revenue Service’s screenings of tax-exempt advocacy groups.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »