CRIME

House Burglaries Baffle Staff, Police

Updated: May 17, 2012 | 5:03 p.m.
May 16, 2012 | 9:42 p.m.

The Capitol in Washington is seen with a marble statue that stands in front of the Rayburn House Office Building in the foreground. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly attributed a statement from Lt. Kimberly Schneider of the U.S. Capitol Police. She did not make any comment about processing reports. 

House officials on Thursday alerted members and their offices to “remain vigilant” and to report any suspicious activity in light of news of the break-ins over the last month into at least three lawmakers’ offices and several committee offices.

The “Dear Colleague” letter from House Administration Committee Chairman Dan Lungren, R-Calif., and ranking member Robert Brady, D-Pa., also assures members that U.S. Capitol Police “has taken immediate action to increase surveillance and police patrol activity throughout the House office buildings.”

The letter was circulated following a National Journal Daily report about the break-ins that have U.S. Capitol Police gumshoes working to find a pattern and the culprits, with missing items ranging from cash and expensive computer equipment to autographed baseballs and alcohol.

(MAP: Where the House Office Break-Ins Happened)

In at least four of the cases, thieves broke into the offices at night when doors were locked, leading some staffers to believe they were victims of an inside job.

“The evidence points to someone with access to my office, and other offices in the Capitol complex, as the perpetrator,” freshman Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., surmised in a letter to the House’s Office of the Chief Administrative Officer, NJ reported.

In the alert later on Thursday to members from Lungren and Brady confirming the NJ report, they instruct that “all offices remain vigilant and report any suspicious activity to the [Capitol Police] Criminal Investigations Section."

Additionally, the committee alert requests that offices immediately report stolen items to the U.S. Captiol Police House Division.

(RELATED: GOP-Led House Approves Reauthorization of Its Own Violence Against Women Bill)

Other offices hit along with Gowdy’s—some of which handle information dealing with issues of national security, though nothing of a sensitive nature was reportedly taken—include those of Reps. Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., and Jon Runyan, R-N.J.; the Homeland Security Appropriations Subcommittee; and the Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Those looking for some common link might note that Lewis serves on Appropriations; Gowdy sits on Oversight; and Runyan is a member of the Armed Services Committee. Also, staffers on the House Oversight Subcommittee on Health Care, District of Columbia, Census, and the National Archives, which Gowdy chairs, reported that $200 of their money went missing during business hours.

But whether that represent anything more than coincidence is uncertain.

(RELATED: War Over Women Rages On)

In each case, items stolen were high in street value. Computer monitors, cameras, and cash were taken most frequently; other items included blazers, personal iPods, and, in three cases, alcohol. Lewis’s office reportedly lost four signed baseballs, six bottles of wine, and a $200 set of presidential Easter eggs. In at least four cases, thieves broke into the offices during the evening while doors were locked.

Matthew Van Patton, Gowdy’s chief of staff, is fighting an uphill battle with House Administration to replace two cameras and a computer monitor—totaling $1,750 in value—that were missing from the lawmaker’s office after the April 10 break-in.

House rules require members to personally pay a fee as well as take the replacement cost out of their office stipends when equipment is stolen, but they can apply for a waiver and if its approved they need not pay. Almost a month after the incident, the chief administrative officer notified Gowdy that he had to cut a personal check totaling $763.63 payable to the U.S. Treasury as a penalty. 

CAO spokesman Dan Weiser said that is standard practice.

It is meant to “establish accountability of taxpayer resources”—in other words, partially counter the taxpayer burden of paying for the same item twice, he said.

Gowdy appealed, accusing the House Administration Committee of punishing him for being the victim of an inside job—all the doors were locked when his staff opened the office on April 11.

Gowdy added that Capitol Police confirmed his suspicion and pointed to a “rash of numerous similar occurrences” in House buildings.

Next door to Gowdy, Runyan’s office was burglarized on the same night—it was the second break-in at his office.

Runyan Chief of Staff Stacy Barton wants a better notification system. She said that other staffers dropped by when they heard by word of mouth but that no official notice went out.

“Clearly it’s going on, and we’re just not hearing about it,” Barton said.

Barton said she found it easier to replace the stolen items out of pocket rather than tap the office fund and pay a fine. Runyan, like Gowdy, is a new member who had to furnish most of his office last year. To show fiscal austerity, the House trimmed office budgets this year. Van Patton said he was proud to send $126,000 of his first year’s stipend back to Treasury, but now he has to tighten the belt further to replace the stolen equipment.

“It doesn’t feel fair to me,” Van Patton said. “I managed my budget, I bought responsibly. Security is not my job.”

And without better surveillance of the building, Van Patton is reluctant to replace the items.

“I have no assurance this is not going to happen again,” he said.

The House Administration Committee does not provide insurance for office property, but a committee spokesman said members may buy private insurance.

Capitol Police spokeswoman Lt. Kimberly Schneider said there is an “active, open investigation regarding these cases.”

Similar reports filed this month are still being processed, according to a Capitol Police officer.

In April of last year, there was only one report of theft in an office. That report did not specify whether or not it was a break-in.

No such break-ins were reported in Senate offices.

Anyone with information is asked to call the USCP Criminal Investigation Section at (202) 224-0928.

Where the Break-ins Happened

Billy House contributed

This article appears in the May 17, 2012, edition of National Journal Daily.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Lawyer: IRS Witness Will Decline to Testify" -- High drama is expected at the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday as a top IRS official has been subpoenaed to appear, despite signaling her intention to invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to testify.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:49 p.m.

Latest Response by Dave McCurdy: Natural Gas Market Will Find Balance

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

4:24 p.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: We Need a New Policy for a New Day

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

3:21 p.m.

Latest Response by Tim Peckinpaugh: LNG Exports: Let the Market Decide

More Expert Opinions »