6 Signs Ashley Judd Will Run Against Mitch McConnell

The actress speaks at George Washington U amid Kentucky's Senate-race buzz.

Updated: March 4, 2013 | 12:48 p.m.
March 1, 2013 | 6:20 p.m.

Actress Ashley Judd cheers before an NCAA Final Four semifinal college basketball tournament game between Kentucky and Louisville Saturday, March 31, 2012, in New Orleans. (AP Photo/David J. Phillip)   ()

Will she or won’t she run?

Actress Ashley Judd didn’t answer the question Friday of whether she’ll challenge Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., for his Senate seat in 2014. "Is there an elephant in the room?" Judd joked at one point.

But her appearance at George Washington University, officially to discuss women’s health and reproductive rights, offered quite a few hints that she is leaning toward running. Her are six of the biggest ones:

1. Kentucky, Kentucky, Kentucky. Judd has quite a few “y'all”s up her sleeve and is willing use them. She dropped some Southern charm and Kentucky knowledge on the D.C. crowd, asking one woman what county in Kentucky she was from and talking about her own rural upbringing. Then there was the way she framed the issues of feminism, which Judd defined as all people — men and women — "made in the image and likeness of our creator" and thus equal.

2. Her D.C. schedule. Judd tried to play off Friday’s event as one that has been in the making for five years — "Get that?” she said, hinting to the reporters in the room — but the reality is that Judd is making the rounds in Washington for the second time in as many weeks. That’s not happenstance. That’s the kind of schedule for someone closing in on a political candidacy.

3. She has the Republicans’ attention. Not only have Republicans launched attacks against Judd already, but the National Republican Senatorial Committee is paying close attention to every move she makes. NRSC spokesman Brad Dayspring spent the afternoon taunting her speech on Twitter, firing off two dozen tweets. The choicest nugget Republicans were highlighting from Friday’s speech was Judd’s offhand remark, “We winter in Scotland; we’re smart like that.” The video was quickly clipped and posted online.

4. She’s very press aware. Celebrities who aren’t planning to run for political office don’t tend to be openly nervous about how they’ll be quoted after a speech. Judd was plainly on edge Friday. “I’m a lot more nervous than you are,” she told one student questioner. “There are people here who don’t give a rat’s you-know-what about public health.” After one verbal misfire, Judd said, “That's the one thing that will end up in the paper.”

5. The company she keeps. Judd didn’t just waltz in solo to her event at George Washington University’s School of Public Health and Health Services. She was accompanied by security and university officials and, notably, Jess McIntosh, communications director for EMILY’s List. That would be the same EMILY’s List, the group dedicated to electing women who support abortion rights, which has been working for months behind the scenes to get Judd into the race.

6. Her mom. Among those in the audience for Friday’s event was Judd’s singer mother, Naomi Judd. When National Journal asked the elder Judd her thoughts on Ashley potentially running for office, she paused, pursed her lips, and twisted her fingers in a locked motion.

This article appears in the March 4, 2013, edition of National Journal Daily.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "House GOP Makes Aggressive Opening Bid on Immigration " -- "House Republicans are ready to play ball on immigration—aggressively. They are taking the strategy they attribute to President Obama—pushing for legislation and taking political credit, win or lose—and using it for themselves. They are asking for big-time enforcement, much of it highly offensive to Democrats. If the final negotiations don’t work out, they can always say they tried and Democrats rejected their overtures."

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

Why Democrats Are Already Jumping Aboard the Hillary Clinton Bandwagon

June 18, 2013
Claire McCaskill's endorsement was a bow to reality: Democrats don't want to challenge Clinton in 2016.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

No Guarantee of a GOP Senate Majority

June 17, 2013
The disproportionate exposure for the chamber’s Democrats is very clear. But can Republicans capitalize on their opportunities?
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Why We Lack Good Privacy Guidelines

June 13, 2013
Technology innovations have served to strip away privacy. They could also be the key to restoring it.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Hands-Free Won't Cut It

June 18, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Consider the Opportunity Before Us

Energy Experts

What's the Future of Electric Cars?

June 17, 2013

Latest Response by Phyllis Cuttino: TBD

Energy Experts

What's the Future of Electric Cars?

June 14, 2013

Latest Response by Brigham McCown: Electric Cars and Their Dirty Secret

More Expert Opinions »