Democrats Face Unfair Fight in Midterms

Democrats face a heavy headwind going into the midterms due to the president’s low approval ratings.

US President Barack Obama speaks during the White House Summit on Working Families on June 23, 2014 in Washington, DC. 
National Journal
Charlie Cook
June 23, 2014, 5:30 p.m.

Gen­er­ally speak­ing, the fur­ther in­to a U.S. pres­id­ent’s ten­ure in of­fice one gets, the less volat­il­ity there is in that pres­id­ent’s job-ap­prov­al rat­ing.

It’s pretty lo­gic­al that 1,979 days in­to Barack Obama’s pres­id­ency, the num­ber of people most in­clined to ap­prove of his per­form­ance has sta­bil­ized, as has the num­ber of those dis­posed to dis­ap­prove of him. Giv­en that Obama tends to evoke par­tic­u­larly strong emo­tions with bed­rock sup­port­ers and equally adam­ant op­pon­ents, ar­gu­ably more people than usu­al have locked in their opin­ions. And those who are un­de­cided by this point are the folks who have pretty much checked out of polit­ics and are un­likely to come down on one side or the oth­er. Simply put, there are few people left who are am­bi­val­ent about Obama’s per­form­ance. We see large vari­ances at this point only when we com­pare the res­ults of one poll­ster to an­oth­er. These vari­ances are likely the res­ult of in­di­vidu­al firms’ unique meth­od­o­lo­gies and sampling idio­syn­crasies; they do not rep­res­ent the genu­ine chan­ging of minds.

With the Gal­lup Or­gan­iz­a­tion sampling a little more than 500 adults per night, around 7,500 in a week (with a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 1.13 with a 95 per­cent con­fid­ence level) and 15,000 in a month (mar­gin of er­ror +/-.8), the lar­ger samples are more ac­cur­ate. Each weekly poll con­sists of at least three times more in­ter­views than the typ­ic­al na­tion­al poll of between 800 and 1,000 re­spond­ents; thus with Gal­lup us­ing uni­form meth­od­o­logy, it is the most use­ful poll to track the subtle shifts that do ac­tu­ally oc­cur.

Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ing since his 2012 reelec­tion has de­clined gradu­ally through 2013. It picked up a bit in 2014, to an av­er­age of 44 per­cent ap­prov­al and 51 per­cent dis­ap­prov­al for the months of April and May. To be clear, these are bad ap­prov­al rat­ings, but they have been worse, and they now ap­pear to have sta­bil­ized in the spring of this year, at that 44 per­cent level. It is not that sur­pris­ing, though, that the af­ter­math of the con­tro­versy sur­round­ing the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s trade of five Guantanamo de­tain­ees for Army Sgt. Bowe Ber­g­dahl, com­bined with the dis­clos­ures con­cern­ing the Vet­er­ans Af­fairs health care sys­tem, would move the pres­id­ent’s ap­prov­al and dis­ap­prov­al needles. Over Gal­lup’s sev­en-day sampling peri­od end­ing Sat­urday, June 21, Obama’s job-ap­prov­al rat­ing was 41 per­cent (with a dis­ap­prov­al of 54 per­cent). Dur­ing the week of June 9-15, the same poll showed the pres­id­ent with an ap­prov­al rat­ing of 42 per­cent — note­worthy be­cause for the full months of April and May, Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ing re­mained at 44 per­cent.

In polit­ics and polling, as in real es­tate, un­der­wa­ter or “up­side down” ap­prov­al rat­ings are not a good thing for an elec­ted of­fi­cial. Moreover, in the case of a pres­id­ent head­ing in­to a midterm elec­tion, with the midterm of­ten said to be a ref­er­en­dum on the in­cum­bent pres­id­ent, this is a bad thing for the pres­id­ent’s party. Every point de­cline cre­ates just a bit more head­wind against Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates fa­cing dif­fi­cult races across the coun­try. Spe­cific­ally, this makes the chal­lenge even more oner­ous for the Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates where the party is de­fend­ing U.S. Sen­ate seats in the six states that Mitt Rom­ney car­ried by 14 points or more in 2012: in­cum­bents Mark Be­gich in Alaska, Mark Pry­or in Arkan­sas, Mary Landrieu in Louisi­ana, and ap­poin­ted Sen. John Walsh in Montana, along with Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates in open seats in South Dakota and West Vir­gin­ia. While that is some­what self-evid­ent — a lot of people talk about the Demo­crat­ic chal­lenge in hold­ing onto their Sen­ate ma­jor­ity — it seems that this prob­lem is of­ten un­der­stated. Per­suad­ing people who dis­ap­prove of a sit­ting pres­id­ent to still vote for a Sen­ate can­did­ate of that pres­id­ent’s party is a real chal­lenge in a midterm elec­tion.

Com­pound­ing this prob­lem for Demo­crats is the makeup of the midterm elect­or­ate. This midterm-vot­ing group is older, whiter, more con­ser­vat­ive, and more Re­pub­lic­an than those who turn out in a pres­id­en­tial elec­tion. Young and minor­ity voters who flocked to the polls in 2008 and 2012 are very dif­fi­cult to mo­tiv­ate for a Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate who very clearly isn’t Barack Obama. They got revved up for Obama in a pres­id­en­tial elec­tion year, but can en­dangered Demo­crats now get these voters ex­cited for them in a midterm as well? The op­pos­i­tion is gal­van­ized, but get­ting these more sporad­ic voters to turn out is far harder.

Those who seem to think that this elec­tion is a fair fight, tak­ing place on a level play­ing field, are badly mis­taken.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×