Ethics Case Shrouds a GOP Star

Committee will determine whether to investigate McMorris Rodgers further

U.S. Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers
National Journal
Billy House
March 23, 2014, 7:56 a.m.

The House Eth­ics Com­mit­tee is set to an­nounce by Monday night wheth­er it will in­vest­ig­ate Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence Chair­wo­man Cathy Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers to de­term­ine wheth­er she vi­ol­ated an ob­scure House rule on the way to win­ning a top party lead­er­ship spot.

The 44-year-old from Wash­ing­ton is the No. 4-ranked Re­pub­lic­an lead­er in the House and a rising polit­ic­al star. The bi­par­tis­an Eth­ics Com­mit­tee will likely draw cri­ti­cism if it presses the case — and also if it doesn’t.

“It’s all the more in­ter­est­ing be­cause you have a former mem­ber of her own staff mak­ing the al­leg­a­tions,” said Melanie Sloan, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of Cit­izens for Re­spons­ib­il­ity and Eth­ics in Wash­ing­ton.

At the cen­ter of the case is Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers’s former press spokes­man, Todd Winer, who was on her staff at the time of the lead­er­ship race but now serves as com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or for Rep. Raul Lab­rador, an Idaho Re­pub­lic­an. The charges in­volve claims that Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers com­mingled cam­paign and of­fi­cial House funds to win a slim ma­jor­ity in her lead­er­ship race against Rep. Tom Price of Geor­gia in late 2012.

News that the Eth­ics Com­mit­tee was re­view­ing the mat­ter of­fi­cially sur­faced in Feb­ru­ary, just a week after Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers grabbed the na­tion­al spot­light as her party’s choice to give the GOP re­sponse to Pres­id­ent Obama’s State of the Uni­on Ad­dress.

The case was re­ferred in Decem­ber from the in­de­pend­ent Of­fice of Con­gres­sion­al Eth­ics, which con­duc­ted its own re­view.

Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers’s cur­rent staffers in­sists there was no wrong­do­ing, and her law­yer, El­li­ot Berke, dis­missed the fact that the OCE re­ferred the case. He even took a swipe at the Of­fice of Con­gres­sion­al Eth­ics it­self, sug­gest­ing that “the OCE reg­u­larly refers mat­ters to the House Eth­ics Com­mit­tee for fur­ther re­view” and call­ing it “an un­for­tu­nate rite of pas­sage for many mem­bers of Con­gress.”

“Such re­views are vir­tu­ally auto­mat­ic,” Berke said, “and as the com­mit­tee al­ways points out, do not in­dic­ate that any vi­ol­a­tion has oc­curred, or re­flect any judg­ment on be­half of the com­mit­tee.”

Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers’s of­fice had no com­ment head­ing in­to Monday.

The OCE’s ini­tial find­ings still have not been made pub­lic, al­though they may be re­leased Monday. Sloan says it re­mains dif­fi­cult for those out­side the in­vest­ig­a­tion to in­de­pend­ently gauge its mer­its.

At the time of the lead­er­ship race, Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers was already the con­fer­ence vice chair, the highest-rank­ing wo­man serving in House GOP lead­er­ship. She also served as the li­ais­on between Mitt Rom­ney’s pres­id­en­tial cam­paign and House Re­pub­lic­ans. But her as­cen­sion to the chair­man­ship was any­thing but as­sured.

Price was then the Re­pub­lic­an Policy Com­mit­tee chair­man — the No. 5 lead­er­ship job — and a former Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee chair­man. He had a deep well of sup­port from con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers of the con­fer­ence.

Dur­ing her cam­paign to win over GOP col­leagues, Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers mailed a pack­et to each of them, tout­ing her role in com­mu­nic­at­ing the con­ser­vat­ive agenda in TV ap­pear­ances and say­ing she “raised over $1,000,000 to the NR­CC, con­trib­uted over $300,000 to can­did­ates, and traveled to 51 con­gres­sion­al dis­tricts in 22 states.”

Winer told in­vest­ig­at­ors that she broke the rule against com­ming­ling cam­paign and of­fi­cial House re­sources. But sources sym­path­et­ic to Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers have sought to de­pict him as a dis­gruntled former em­ploy­ee, who was un­happy about not get­ting the job as the House Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or.

Winer did not re­turn a tele­phone call or an email to dis­cuss the case.

The Eth­ics Com­mit­tee has op­tions in how it handles the case. It could simply drop the mat­ter. Or it could an­nounce that it’s found enough to take its in­quiry to the next level, which would be to em­pan­el a spe­cial in­vest­ig­at­ive sub­pan­el to de­term­ine wheth­er there was a vi­ol­a­tion.

Whatever the out­come, Sloan said that cases like this must be taken ser­i­ously. “This is not just a rite of pas­sage,” she said.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×