Ted Cruz’s Debt Ceiling Gamble Could Ruin His Senate Career

None

National Journal
Michael Catalini
Feb. 12, 2014, 2:45 p.m.

Sen. Ted Cruz gambled and lost Wed­nes­day in a bid to per­suade his Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues to take an­oth­er stand on the na­tion’s rising debt, re­open­ing old wounds that could make him a per­man­ent pari­ah to party lead­ers.

Cruz de­man­ded a clo­ture vote on a bill to raise the debt ceil­ing, for­cing his Re­pub­lic­an brethren — in­clud­ing Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell — to cast some polit­ic­ally dif­fi­cult votes.

Af­ter­ward, the tem­pes­tu­ous Tex­an was not the least bit humbled or apo­lo­get­ic. In fact, asked wheth­er Mc­Con­nell should be re­placed as party lead­er, Cruz didn’t pause. “You know, that is ul­ti­mately a de­cision for the voters of Ken­tucky to make,” he said, fail­ing to de­fend Mc­Con­nell, who faces a dif­fi­cult reelec­tion fight.

“Today was a clas­sic vic­tory for Wash­ing­ton es­tab­lish­ment in­terests,” Cruz went on. “The people who lost today were the Amer­ic­an people who find the fisc­al and eco­nom­ic con­di­tions of this na­tion even worse be­cause of a lack of lead­er­ship.”

Some Re­pub­lic­ans who voted for clo­ture but against the bill it­self turned the lead­er­ship ques­tion back on Cruz, ar­guing that he had no plan or le­gis­la­tion wait­ing in the wings had the bill been de­feated.

“What’s the oth­er strategy? De­fault?” asked Sen. Mike Jo­hanns of Neb­raska. “See how the world re­acts to that? See what the stock mar­ket does? I think to be a lead­er you have to do very hard things, and so he’s new here.”

The votes Wed­nes­day re­called the di­vi­sions between Re­pub­lic­ans dur­ing the Oc­to­ber shut­down, when col­leagues like Sen. Bob Cork­er of Ten­ness­ee dis­agreed with the polit­ic­al ef­fic­acy of Cruz’s ap­proach. In­deed, Cork­er voted for clo­ture Wed­nes­day, not­ing that Re­pub­lic­ans could have forced only Demo­crats to vote to hike the debt lim­it if a fili­buster had not been threatened.

In fact, Re­pub­lic­ans could have agreed to a straight up-or-down vote had Cruz not ob­jec­ted. In­stead, Sen­ate Demo­crats were forced to round up enough GOP sup­port to reach a three-fifths ma­jor­ity.

The drama un­fol­ded in scores of private con­ver­sa­tions as the clo­ture vote was held open for an hour. Only five Re­pub­lic­an sup­port­ers were needed to reach the 60-vote threshold, but as the vote closed it be­came clear lead­ers were try­ing to round up more GOP votes. When Mc­Con­nell and Minor­ity Whip John Cornyn of Texas signaled a yes vote, there was an aud­ible gasp in the press gal­lery above the cham­ber.

After an hour of arm-twist­ing, 12 Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors — in­clud­ing Mc­Con­nell — voted to ad­vance the bill, which was then ap­proved 55-43 and sent to Pres­id­ent Obama. The bill will lift the $17 tril­lion debt ceil­ing un­til March 2015.

“In my view, every Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­an should have stood to­geth­er and said what every one of us tells our con­stitu­ents back home, which is that we will not go along with rais­ing the debt ceil­ing while do­ing noth­ing to fix the un­der­ly­ing out-of-con­trol spend­ing prob­lem,” Cruz said.

After the vote, Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors heaped praise on Mc­Con­nell and his lead­er­ship team, draw­ing a sharp con­trast with Cruz. Sen. Or­rin Hatch of Utah had pub­licly said he would vote no on clo­ture, and was asked why he changed. “I saw polit­ics be­ing played. I didn’t want it to be a polit­ic­al game,” Hatch said. “The key vote, of course, is wheth­er you vote for the debt ceil­ing.”

Only that’s not the key vote for Cruz and some oth­er con­ser­vat­ives, who want to fo­cus on re­du­cing spend­ing.

“The debt ceil­ing is a fire alarm, and what these people are do­ing is un­plug­ging the fire alarm,” said Sen. James Risch of Idaho. “There’s a fire burn­ing. We need to put out the fire, not un­plug the fire alarm.”

Re­laxed-look­ing Demo­crats watched the Re­pub­lic­an vote-count­ing from their side of the aisle. Sen. Chuck Schu­mer of New York, the No. 3 Demo­crat, drew a dir­ect link between the shut­down, Wed­nes­day’s vote, and Cruz.

“I think his memory doesn’t seem to last longer than six months,” Schu­mer said. “It puts his own people on the spot. Demo­crats have tra­di­tion­ally voted for the debt ceil­ing in the past. I think it puts his side much more on the spot than our side, and I think they think that.”

Cruz brushed the no­tion aside. How does it feel, he was asked, mak­ing Re­pub­lic­ans like Mc­Con­nell take tough votes?

“It should have been a very easy vote,” Cruz said.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×