Senate Republicans Flip the Script on Unemployment

None

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 07: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) speaks to reporters after attending the weekly Democrat policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol on January 7, 2014 in Washington, DC. Senate Democrats gathered at a luncheon to discuss various issues inlcluding minimum wage and unemployment insurance.
National Journal
Michael Catalini Elahe Izadi
See more stories about...
Michael Catalini Elahe Izadi
Jan. 7, 2014, 4:17 p.m.

Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans, tired of play­ing by the Demo­crat­ic script, are plan­ning to flip the story line on their op­pon­ents — and they want to use the bill ex­tend­ing un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance to do it.

Angry after Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id changed Sen­ate rules last year to lim­it their pro­ced­ur­al weapons, Re­pub­lic­ans are tak­ing a new ap­proach. On Tues­day, six GOP sen­at­ors voted with the Demo­crat­ic caucus to pro­ceed to de­bate on the bill, which would ex­tend un­em­ploy­ment be­ne­fits to the long-term job­less for three months.

The move was a genu­ine sur­prise. And it floored Demo­crats.

“I guess be­ing Ir­ish, I’m al­ways ex­pect­ing the worst,” said Sen. Jack Reed, the Rhode Is­land Demo­crat who sponsored the meas­ure along with Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada. “So yeah, I was sur­prised. But that might be more cul­tur­al than polit­ic­al.”

Demo­crats ex­pec­ted Re­pub­lic­ans to block the bill, ful­filling what aides have called Re­id’s “fa­vor­ite nar­rat­ive” about the GOP: that they’re ob­struc­tion­ists.

In­stead, Re­pub­lic­ans have thrown the is­sue back to Re­id, who must now fa­cil­it­ate a com­prom­ise pro­cess — in­clud­ing Re­pub­lic­an amend­ments — if the bill is to win ap­prov­al.

Just be­cause six Re­pub­lic­ans joined Demo­crats to let the bill pro­ceed on Tues­day doesn’t mean the ex­ten­sion is headed for pas­sage later this week. In fact, a num­ber of those Re­pub­lic­ans have said they won’t sup­port it un­less the meas­ure is paid for. GOP law­makers could force a second clo­ture vote and send the bill down — un­less Re­id gives them a reas­on not to.

“In a sense it’s call­ing his bluff,” said Sen. Dan Coats, the In­di­ana Re­pub­lic­an who was among those who voted for clo­ture, to the sur­prise of many.

“This was a vote to move to de­bate, move to amend­ment,” he said. “If Harry Re­id wants to shut that down, start the New Year just like he ended the old year, then that’s his choice.”

The three-month ex­ten­sion was the Demo­crats’ open­ing bid, with Re­pub­lic­ans, in­clud­ing House Speak­er John Boehner, say­ing they would sup­port an ex­ten­sion only if it con­tained an off­set. Demo­crats have long balked at pay­ing for the fed­er­al pro­gram, ar­guing that it is an emer­gency meas­ure that hasn’t been paid for throughout much of its ex­ist­ence. They also ar­gue it puts money dir­ectly in­to the eco­nomy.

“Cer­tainly for this three months, this def­in­itely should not be paid for,” Re­id said. “If they can come up with some — they, mean­ing the Re­pub­lic­ans — something that’s reas­on­able for a year­long ex­ten­sion, we’ll take a look at it.”

In­deed, the con­ver­sa­tion about an off­set has be­gun, des­pite Demo­crat­ic op­pos­i­tion.

Re­id ruled out Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell’s open­ing of­fer, which paid for the ex­ten­sion by delay­ing the Af­ford­able Care Act’s in­di­vidu­al man­date for one year. Mc­Con­nell sought to get a vote on his amend­ment Tues­day, but Re­id blocked it.

Now Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans are pro­pos­ing a bevy of off­sets and amend­ments — and call­ing on Re­id to let them have a vote. GOP pro­pos­als are all over the place. One from Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., who voted for clo­ture, would pay for the be­ne­fits and roll back cuts to mil­it­ary pen­sions in the budget deal by re­quir­ing So­cial Se­cur­ity num­bers for any chil­dren claimed for ad­di­tion­al child tax cred­its.

Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, the No. 3 Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­an, offered an amend­ment that in­cludes a pro­vi­sion to ex­empt the long-term un­em­ployed from Obama­care’s in­di­vidu­al man­date. Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ar­iz., wants to tight­en re­stric­tions on people eli­gible for both un­em­ploy­ment and dis­ab­il­ity in­sur­ance.

Re­id has signaled he may be open to al­low­ing amend­ments, say­ing “we’ll take a look if they have something that’s ser­i­ous.”

But it is un­clear what “something that’s ser­i­ous” may be. The open­ing lines from either side — an Obama­care-man­date delay from Re­pub­lic­ans and clos­ing tax loop­holes from Demo­crats — are non­starters. “Right now, every­one should un­der­stand, the low-hanging fruit is gone. We’ve scav­enged every place we could go,” Re­id said.

Still, the de­bate is front and cen­ter. Pres­id­ent Obama spoke in the East Room on Tues­day, call­ing on law­makers to pass the Sen­ate bill. And he has phoned law­makers on the Hill, such as Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who spoke with him about off­sets and the need for a job-train­ing com­pon­ent.

Collins, who voted for clo­ture, may with­hold sup­port for fi­nal pas­sage sans an off­set, she said. “It’s un­der­stand­ably dis­turb­ing to many mem­bers of our caucus to vi­ol­ate the budget we just passed, so I think we need a con­cer­ted ef­fort to find an off­set, and that is un­der­way,” she said. “I’ve had con­ver­sa­tions with a couple of Demo­crats about the de­sirab­il­ity of a pay-for.”

The Reed-Heller ex­ten­sion would ap­ply ret­ro­act­ively to the 1.3 mil­lion who lost be­ne­fits Dec. 28. People qual­i­fy for the be­ne­fits once they ex­haust state-based aid, which runs 26 weeks in most places. A year­long ex­ten­sion would cost $25 bil­lion over 10 years, ac­cord­ing to the Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice, and des­pite the ef­forts of Demo­crats, didn’t make it in­to the fi­nal budget deal. A three-month ex­ten­sion would cost about $6.5 bil­lion.

“Cer­tainly we have to be very care­ful with what we do,” said Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Patty Mur­ray, D-Wash. “We don’t want to take out of one hand and put it in the oth­er.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×