• National Journal.com
  • Fri. May 16, 2008
  • Sign In

  • My Account | Free Trial

nationaljournal.com > CongressDaily

    • Home
    • The Magazine
    • The Hotline
    • CongressDaily
  • About Us
  • News & Blogs
  • Earlybird
  • Hotline On Call
  • Blogometer
  • Ad Spotlight
  • Poll Track
  • Markup Reports
  • Insider Interviews
  • Tech Daily Dose
  • Multimedia
  • Play of the Day
  • Sunday Snapshot
  • Hotline TV
  • National Journal On Air
  • Columns
  • Mark Blumenthal
  • Ronald Brownstein
  • Eliza Carney
  • Charlie Cook (Tues.)
  • Charlie Cook (Fri.)
  • Clive Crook
  • John Mercurio
  • William Powers
  • Jonathan Rauch
  • Bruce Stokes
  • William Schneider
  • Stuart Taylor
  • Amy Walter
  • Campaigns 2008
  • Main
  • White House
  • Senate
  • House
  • Governor
  • Political Stock Exchange
  • Subscriber Resources
  • The Almanac
  • Capital Source
  • Daybook
  • Affiliate Sites
  • The Atlantic
  • Cook Report
  • Global Security Newswire
  • Government Executive
  • Washington Week
CongressDaily
Search

Advanced Search

Search Sponsor:
About CongressDaily
Subscriptions | Contact Us
  • Latest AM
  • Latest PM
  • Mark-Up Reports
  • Columns
    • Balance of Payments
    • China Watch
    • Forward Observer
    • Health Matters
    • People
    • Outside Influences
    • Wired in Washington
  • Hot Topics
    • Campaigns 2008
    • Cloakroom
    • Focus on Earmarks
    • Appropriations
    • Issue Pages
    • Tech Central
  • Print
    • Print
  • Email
  • Reprints
  • Tools Sponsor:

Finalized Farm Bill Might Become Law Without President Bush’s Signature

Thu. May 8, 2008


Negotiators finished the new farm bill Wednesday and plan to take it to the floor of the House and Senate in six days amid signals that President Bush's lack of support may not stop it from becoming law.

After a meeting in the Capitol at which the negotiators made changes to the bill to make it fit within CBO scores, House Agriculture ranking member Bob Goodlatte said President Bush had told him he does not support the bill but that House "members need to vote their districts'" interests. "The president did not say anything about vetoing the bill," Goodlatte said. He added that Bush had "spoken kindly" of Goodlatte's efforts to include the president's reform priorities in the bill.

Bush's statement to Goodlatte creates the possibility of a veto-proof, two-thirds majority in the House and Senate for the bill.

There is also the possibility that Bush could allow the bill to become law without his signature. Under the Constitution, the bill would become law automatically without the president's signature if Bush does not act on it for 10 days, with the exception of Sundays, while Congress is in session.

Goodlatte declined to comment on whether Bush would take that route but said, "That's certainly an option that he has."

Bush and his aides have said the new farm bill costs too much and does not include enough reforms to curb farm subsidy payments to wealthy farmers and landowners. Democrats have said they believe Bush hoped to discourage Congress from finishing the bill so he could say in the November elections that a Democratic-controlled Congress could not write a farm bill.

Goodlatte said he intended to support the bill unless he found something objectionable in the conference report. He did not know whether the bill would garner the two-thirds vote necessary for an override. There is "very, very strong support on both sides of the aisle, but it has not been whipped," he said.

Goodlatte went to the White House as part of a delegation of House members to discuss a variety of issues. The exchange between Goodlatte and the president occurred after a week of tense politicking in which Republicans strategized to try to get the president's support and White House staff deflected their efforts.

Senate Agriculture Chairman Tom Harkin and Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad both said they still hoped Bush would sign the bill. "This is the most dramatic reform of any farm bill for a very, very long time," Conrad said.

Harkin and House Agriculture Chairman Collin Peterson said they and the other negotiators would reveal details of the bill today

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said negotiators decided to ban the direct payments that come whether prices are high or low for nonfarmers with adjusted gross incomes of $500,000 per year and for farmers with adjusted gross incomes of $750,000 per year.

Lobbyists said there would be a ban on conservation payments to people with adjusted gross incomes of $1 million per year unless two thirds of that money comes from agriculture or forestry. Lobbyists also said farmers would be able to retain ownership of grain after they receive loan deficiency payments, but those payments would be based on 30-day rolling average prices.

Grassley said the bill would include a sugar-to-ethanol program and a tax package that would cut the ethanol production tax credit from 51 cents to 45 cents, extend the ethanol tariff for two years and create a $1 tax credit for cellulosic ethanol production.

Senate Majority Leader Reid also said Wednesday the Senate would take up the farm bill next week.

by Jerry Hagstrom, with Ben Schneider contributing

Thu. May 8, 2008

  •  
  •  

CongressDaily Email Alerts

CongressDaily Mobile Alerts

5/8/2008 AM Contents

  • Supplemental Continues On Two Tracks
  • Finalized Farm Bill Might Become Law Without President Bush’s Signature
  • Rockefeller Floats Proposal To Break Impasse Over FISA
  • DeGette Hopes New Stem-Cell Bill Lays Path For Future
  • Gulf Coast Senators Come Up Short On Flood Amendments
  • Despite Bush Opposition, Dodd Will Proceed With Markup
  • FBI Withdraws NSL Subpoena, Freeing Target To Talk
  • Senators Say Rural Air Service Will Suffer Due To Merger
  • Dems Target Attention On Strategic Reserve, Tax Incentives
  • House Panel Cuts European Missile Defense Site By $232M
  • House Dems Plan To Add Torture Ban To Authorization Bill
  • 'Orphan Works' Measure Moves To Full House Committee
  • CFTC Chief Rejects Claims Speculators Drive Oil Price Up

PEOPLE

  • People

LOOKING IN

  • Contract Killers

HILL BRIEFS

  • Foreign Trade Council Pushes FTA And TAA
  • Three Senators Press Treasury On Currency Manipulation
  • Lawmakers From Both Parties Warn Bush On Nuclear Pact
  • Special Counsel Scott Bloch Must Resign, Rep. Davis Says
  • Waxman Challenges Leavitt About New Medicaid Rules
  • Goal Is Doha Deal This Year, Schwab Says In State Speech
  • Let The Word Go Forth: St. Paul Welcomes GOP
  • Rush Clarifies Letter To FCC On XM-Sirius Radio Merger
  • Justice Directs New Funds To Project Safe Childhood

MARKUP REPORTS

  • House Administration OKs Grants For Paper Balloting
  • Child Health Center Bill Advances To House Floor
  • House Bill Would Build On Nanotech Initiative
  • Pediatric Cancer Bill Clears House Panel
  • Natural Resources Clears Bill Establishing Centennial Fund

POLITICAL ROUNDUP

  • Democratic Candidate Abandons Campaign For Young's Seat
  • Lautenberg Agrees To Second Debate With Primary Foes

CORRECTION

  • Correction

Recent Editions

CongressDaily AM
  • Friday, May 16, 2008
  • Thursday, May 15, 2008
  • Wednesday, May 14, 2008
  • Tuesday, May 13, 2008
  • Monday, May 12, 2008
CongressDaily PM
  • Thursday, May 15, 2008
  • Wednesday, May 14, 2008
  • Tuesday, May 13, 2008
  • Monday, May 12, 2008
  • Friday, May 09, 2008

Highlights

CongressDaily

  • Senate Panel Passes $193 Billion War Supplemental Bill
  • Troop Funds Shot Down After GOP Gambit

The Hotline

  • You Talkin To ME?
  • Let's Do The Time Warp Again

National Journal Magazine

  • Battle Fatigue
  • Congressional Insiders Poll
  • Zing! An Old Weapon Gathers Dust

National Journal

  • On Air Interview: Henry Waxman
  • On Air Interview: Mike Duncan
Staff Contact Employment Reprints & Back Issues Privacy Policy Advertising
Copyright 2008 by National Journal Group Inc. The Watergate 600 New Hampshire Ave., NW Washington, DC 20037
202-739-8400 · fax 202-833-8069 NationalJournal.com is an Atlantic Media publication.