BUDGET

FY10 Budget Briefing: Agriculture

Updated: February 4, 2011 | 1:43 p.m.
May 7, 2009

The Obama administration today proposed a $25.7 billion budget for discretionary programs at USDA in FY10, up from $24.1 billion in FY09. While the budget does not cover mandatory farm subsidy and nutrition programs, it funds programs such as the expansion of broadband service in rural areas, food safety, conservation and research.

The budget includes previously announced proposals to phase out direct payments to farmers with more than $500,000 in sales; limit a farmer's subsidies to $250,000 per year; cut crop insurance; and reduce a program to sell U.S. food abroad. Lawmakers, however, have already panned the proposals.

Other provisions include adding $1 billion to the child nutrition budget and setting aside $1.25 billion to settle the remaining civil rights claims of black farmers from the Pigford v. Glickman lawsuit. The budget would cut $5 billion in USDA grants to help rural public television stations convert to digital broadcasting and eliminate the rural empowerment grants program.

The USDA budget also terminates numerous member projects, including a $24 million watershed and flood prevention program, on the grounds that Congress earmarked the money, preventing USDA from allocating the funds based on merit. It also offers no new funding for the Agricultural Research Service buildings and facilities program, which got $47 million in FY09.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Latest Edition
SUBSCRIPTION ONLY

Today's cover story: "Lawyer: IRS Witness Will Decline to Testify" -- High drama is expected at the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday as a top IRS official has been subpoenaed to appear, despite signaling her intention to invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to testify.

Read this and all of the stories in the latest digital edition of National Journal Daily.

National Journal Daily
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:49 p.m.

Latest Response by Dave McCurdy: Natural Gas Market Will Find Balance

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

4:24 p.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: We Need a New Policy for a New Day

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

3:21 p.m.

Latest Response by Tim Peckinpaugh: LNG Exports: Let the Market Decide

More Expert Opinions »