CONGRESS

What's the Economic Tipping Point for Bipartisanship?

Updated: August 5, 2011 | 4:14 p.m.
August 5, 2011 | 11:45 a.m.

House Small Business Committee Chairman Sam Graves, R-Mo., has called for lowering the corporate tax rate to 25 percent. (Liz Lynch)

Recent stock-market dips and other dismal economic news raises the question: Just how bad does the economic climate need to get to trigger some policy consensus in Washington on how to make it better?

The widening gap between the two parties' economic visions and the deep divisions in their politics offer little insight or encouragement that Washington will finally pivot to jobs and economic growth in September when Congress returns.

And if there is one precedent that this Congress has established, it’s that the Republican House and the Democratic Senate come together to act only under white-hot pressure such as the threat of default or a government shutdown.  At this rate, the answer may be: much, much worse.

The divisions were underscored on Friday in the wake of another stagnant jobs report and a 9.1% unemployment rate, while the markets continued to rattle amid economic worries about long-term global stability.

In response to the jobs report, House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, laid out his ideas for economic growth and job creation that read like a list of non-negotiables for Democrats: Expand domestic drilling for oil and gas reserves, repeal President Obama’s health care law, enact a balanced-budget amendment, cut taxes, and reduce regulations on businesses.

“Today’s unemployment report is more proof that all of the Washington spending, taxing, and regulating is devastating our economy,” he said.

Rep. Sam Graves, R-Mo., chairman of the Small Business Committee, further argued for lowering the corporate tax rate to 25 percent and passing three stalled trade pacts with South Korea, Panama, and Colombia as part of the GOP's economic vision.

Across the Capitol, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., holds a far different view. Reid, like most Democrats, is calling for greater investments (GOP: read "spending") in clean-energy initiatives and infrastructure. But congressional Republicans have all but ruled out such measures, arguing that extensive government spending, such as the stimulus package, failed to produce the kind of job creation that was promised.

Reid also accused Republicans of putting the tea party's concerns ahead of the economy. "But to accomplish these [job-creation] goals, we need Republicans to stop using commonsense jobs bills as vehicles for the tea party’s ideological agenda and forcing us to run the government from one manufactured crisis to the next,” he said, referring to the debt-ceiling battle that consumed Washington for most of the summer.

It’s no surprise that the heat coming out of Washington is being mirrored back in Americans’ view of Congress. The latest New York Times/CBS poll, out Thursday, gave Congress a record disapproval rating of 84 percent. More troubling to incumbents, however, is the poll's finding that three of four Americans, 75 percent, said that most members of Congress don’t deserve reelection.

Whether Congress can work together on jobs might rely on how seriously lawmakers think their reelections rely on it. So far, Republicans have resisted efforts to cut deals with the White House on economic matters because they believe he has ownership of the economy and will be the one judged for it in 2012. But if those dynamics shift and the public continues to spread the blame across Washington, mutual disgust may be the surest way to get the two parties to work together this fall.

They will face an immediate test with the new Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction. Although the panel’s efforts aren’t necessarily in line with job creation, if the markets continue to rattle and jobs continue to stagnate, the task of improving the long-term U.S. fiscal outlook will take on even greater urgency.

“We have an anemic recovery so far, and all of these people—one-third of the Senate, and the whole House, and the president are up for reelection, and there may be urgency on everyone’s part to do something and try and get this economy moving in a stronger direction,” said Tom O’Donnell, chief of staff to then-House Majority Leader Dick Gephardt, D-Mo., and now a managing partner at Gephardt Government Affairs. “My sense is that the politics, where the economy’s at, this new law, it may drive them to try to work together even more soon.”

O’Donnell is an optimist, but for anyone looking to Congress today for progress on job creation, there is far more evidence in support of pessimism.

Scott Bland contributed

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

10:43 p.m.

Latest Response by Gabriel Roth: But do we not drive to save time?

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:49 p.m.

Latest Response by Dave McCurdy: Natural Gas Market Will Find Balance

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

4:24 p.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: We Need a New Policy for a New Day

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama Pushes to Accommodate, Not Protect, Freedom of the Press

May 21, 2013
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena of AP phone logs begs questions about Obama’s attitude toward the First Amendment and government scrutiny.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
More Columns »