SUPER COMMITTEE

Toomey: Super Committee Making Progress, but 'Not There Yet'

Updated: October 26, 2011 | 9:51 a.m.
October 26, 2011 | 8:24 a.m.

With the super committee’s deadline to cut at least $1.2 trillion from the budget drawing ever closer, Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., is “cautiously optimistic” that the group will soon reach a consensus.

Although Toomey said on MSNBC's Morning Joe that the 12 lawmakers are “not quite there yet,”  he added that the group is working hard to come up with answers to the nation’s high unemployment numbers and jobless rates. 

“There has been progress,” he said on the show on Wednesday. “There are very substantive discussions going on virtually every day.”

But Toomey did not indicate his own willingness to compromise; instead, he articulated the usual GOP talking points--slash regulations, balance the deficit, and, above all, oppose tax increases.

He said that  to get Americans back to work, administrators must incentivize businesses to grow. That can’t be done in the current environment of uncertainty: An unsustainable federal deficit and a threat of tax increases across the board.

Toomey pointed to the energy business in his home state of Pennsylvania as one industry that is limited by excessive regulation.

“The natural gas we have is a staggering quantity,” he said. “But whether it’s coal or refineries or the natural-gas industry, they’ve been layered with all kinds of new regulations that is making it very, very hard for them to grow this industry.”

Toomey maintained that President Obama's jobs bill has failed, and that the administration must figure out how to provide essential services at a price that people can afford, instead of trying to “conjure up demand from the clear-blue sky.”

“I do think that the combination of unsustainable spending, excessive regulation, and a ridiculously complicated tax code definitely has an accumulative effect on our economy,” he said.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Most Read Articles
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »