DEBT CEILING

Senate GOP Blocks Democratic Debt Plan, Opening Door for Compromise

Updated: July 31, 2011 | 2:42 p.m.
July 31, 2011 | 1:27 p.m.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

From National Journal:
Who Wins if the U.S. Defaults?


Plouffe Not Giving Up on Tax Hikes

The Debt Debate: America's New Civil War?

Insiders Support Keeping U.S. Troops in Iraq Past Deadline

PICTURES: Obama Turns 50 This Week; See Other White House Milestones

Senate Republicans on Sunday voted down a bill offered by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., to raise the federal debt ceiling, setting the stage for both chambers to move on a compromise bill.

Congressional leaders were expected to brief members Sunday afternoon on the contours of a compromise bill negotiated between Republican leaders and the White House. Both Senate Republicans and Democrats initially planned to brief members around around 2 p.m., but pushed back those plans. House GOP leaders told members to expect a conference call Sunday afternoon on details of the deal.

“Talks are moving in the right direction, but serious issues remain,” an email Sunday from the GOP conference to member offices said. “And no agreement will be final until members have a chance to weigh in.”

At the conclusion of the Senate vote, Reid changed his vote to “no.” That step allows him to still use the House-passed Boehner bill as a vehicle in which to insert the new compromise deal. A cloture vote on that measure could come on Monday, with a final passage vote on Tuesday. The House would then have to pass the bill. House passage is the main obstacle to enactment of the deal.Leaders said they expected to finalize the agreement.

“After speaking to Republican Leader Mitch McConnell this morning, I would say we are both cautiously optimistic we will reach a conclusion soon,” Reid said on the Senate floor.

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

7:05 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

11:03 a.m.

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »