CONGRESS

QUICK TAKE: Sen. Rand Paul Detained For Refusing TSA Patdown

Updated: January 23, 2012 | 12:05 p.m.
January 23, 2012 | 10:47 a.m.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., was detained by airport security officials on Monday, according to his communications director Moira Bagley, who posted about the incident on Twitter.

“Just got a call from @senrandpaul. He's currently being detained by TSA in Nashville,” Bagley wrote. She did not immediately respond to an email for further information.

Paul’s father, GOP presidential candidate and Texas Rep. Ron Paul, also confirmed the report on his Twitter and Facebook accounts. The elder Paul’s Facebook post had racked up 2,000 comments in the first 30 minutes.

The senior Paul wrote that his son was “being detained by TSA for refusing full body pat-down after anomaly in body scanner in Nashville.”

 

The Transportation Security Administration, which is responsible for airport security, has been the target of public outrage in recent years for its screening practices, which include full-body scans and what critics have described as invasive pat-downs.
The TSA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The TSA confirmed the incident, without naming Paul, but denied that any passenger had been “detained.”
“When an irregularity is found during the TSA screening process, it must be resolved prior to allowing a passenger to proceed to the secure area of the airport,” the agency said in a statement. “Passengers who refuse to complete the screening process cannot be granted access to the secure area in order to ensure the safety of others traveling.”

The Transportation Security Administration, which is responsible for airport security, has been the target of public outrage in recent years for its screening practices, which include full-body scans and what critics have described as invasive pat-downs.

The TSA confirmed the incident, without naming Paul, but denied that any passenger had been “detained.”

“When an irregularity is found during the TSA screening process, it must be resolved prior to allowing a passenger to proceed to the secure area of the airport,” the agency said in a statement. “Passengers who refuse to complete the screening process cannot be granted access to the secure area in order to ensure the safety of others traveling.”

 

Want to stay ahead of the curve? Sign up for National Journal’s AM & PM Must Reads. News and analysis to ensure you don’t miss a thing.

Join the Discussion
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
  • NationalJournal on Twitter
  • NationalJournal on Facebook
  • NationalJournal on Tumblr
  • NationalJournal's RSS Feeds
  • NationalJournal's Email Newsletters
  • NationalJournal on iPhone and iPad
COLUMNS
Reid Wilson: On the Trail

The New Democratic Litmus Test

February 18, 2012
Obama likely will be the last Democrat to win party's presidential nomination without backing same-sex marriage.
Gwen Ifill: Gwen's Take

Black History or American History: What’s the Difference?

February 16, 2012

I’ve often wondered what it meant that the month we set aside to take special note of African-American achievement is the one that’s usually only 28 days long.

Charlie Cook: Charlie Cook's The Cook Report

Risky Business

February 16, 2012
Don’t be fooled into thinking that today’s events will turn November’s election. A lot of time remains.
More Columns »
EXPERT OPINIONS
Transportation Experts

Infrastructure Becomes Campaign Fodder

6:43 p.m.

Latest Response by Emil H. Frankel: Activity, But Little Progress

Transportation Experts

Infrastructure Becomes Campaign Fodder

2:56 p.m.

Latest Response by Jack Schenendorf: Putting the National Interest First

Energy Experts

Where Can Government Energy R&D Have Most Impact?

2:25 p.m.

Latest Response by Brent Erickson: Find White Space in the Whole Oil Barrel

More Expert Opinions »