CONGRESS

Official in GSA Scandal Declines to Testify; IG Looking into Bribery, Kickbacks

Updated: April 16, 2012 | 3:11 p.m.
April 16, 2012 | 3:03 p.m.

At the start of hearings into lavish spending and other improprieties at the General Services Administration, an official at the center of the controversy invoked his right against self-incrimination and declined to testify,  The Washington Post reports.

Jeff Neely, who has been accused of planning a 2010 conference in Las Vegas at a cost of more than $800,000, responded to several questions: “Mr. Chairman, on the advice of my counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my Fifth Amendment constitutional privileges.”

The hearings of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee evoked outrage from both Democrats and Republicans. Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., the panel’s ranking member, called the situation both “indefensible” and “intolerable.”

In response to questions from Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., Inspector General Brian Miller said his office was looking into further allegations of wrongdoing at the GSA, according to the Associated Press. “We do have other ongoing investigations including all sorts of improprieties including bribes and possible kickbacks,” he said.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
New Faces of the 113th Congress
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

10:43 p.m.

Latest Response by Gabriel Roth: But do we not drive to save time?

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:49 p.m.

Latest Response by Dave McCurdy: Natural Gas Market Will Find Balance

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

4:24 p.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: We Need a New Policy for a New Day

More Expert Opinions »