CONGRESS

House Debate on NPR Likely a Dead End

The legislation's prospects are dim in face of Senate and White House opposition.

Updated: March 17, 2011 | 5:02 p.m.
March 17, 2011 | 2:30 p.m.
Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images

National Public Radio headquarters in Washington, D.C.

Republican efforts to cut off federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and NPR are unlikely to advance past the House, as both Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and the White House are weighing in with their opposition.

On Thursday, the House debated the resolution, which would bar NPR from receiving federal grants. The bill would also prohibit local member stations from buying NPR content with federal grant money. On Tuesday, the House voted to cut $50 million from the CPB, which helps fund both NPR and PBS.

"Taxpayers should not be on the hook for something that is widely available in the private market," said Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., who introduced the measure.

In Reid, NPR has an important fan. He frequently cites reports on NPR, which he listens to in the morning.

"I listen to NPR every day,” Reid said in a statement issued on Thursday to National Journal Daily. “Like many Americans, my children and I have benefited from the educational and news programs public radio provides every day of the year. Public radio and the top-notch journalists it employs are valuable resources to people of all ages across the country and I can't understand why Republicans would want to take that away from them."

Reid is likely to block action on the bill in the Senate, though Republicans could try to force a vote on a similar amendment.

Also on Thursday, the White House issued a statement of administration policy announcing that the administration “strongly opposes” the bill. The statement suggests the bill would draw a veto, though it stops short of an explicit veto threat.

Thursday’s floor time was marked by passionate debate over the role of NPR, with Republicans insisting the organization doesn’t need federal money while Democrats called the GOP measure a partisan ploy.

The presiding speaker pro tempore was momentarily the subject of boos and shouts when Democrats complained that the resolution violated the House’s pledge to provide 72 hours for consideration of a bill.

Want to stay ahead of the curve? Sign up for National Journal’s AM & PM Must Reads. News and analysis to ensure you don’t miss a thing.

Leave a Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
  • NationalJournal on Twitter
  • NationalJournal on Facebook
  • NationalJournal on Tumblr
  • NationalJournal's RSS Feeds
  • NationalJournal's Email Newsletters
  • NationalJournal on iPhone and iPad
Columns
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

The Emerging Democratic Divide

9:30 p.m.
The brouhaha over a moderate New Jersey mayor’s comments has aggravated tensions that have been growing within the party’s coalition.
Charlie Cook: Charlie Cook's Off to the Races

If It Hits the Fan

May 21, 2012
Europe’s economy is in a tailspin and China’s is slowing. Our political system is a mess. Who are voters going to blame if it all goes bad? Not just Obama.
Gwen Ifill: Gwen's Take

History's Romance: Why Politics Past Beats Politics Present

May 21, 2012

Is it just my imagination, or have politics and politicians grown smaller?

More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

Powering Our Military: What's the Role of Clean Energy?

12:59 p.m.

Latest Response by Tom Buis: American Families Need American Fuel

Energy Experts

Powering Our Military: What's the Role of Clean Energy?

10:35 a.m.

Latest Response by Keith Crane: DoD Renewable Fuels Investment Premature

Energy Experts

Powering Our Military: What's the Role of Clean Energy?

9:40 a.m.

Latest Response by Kathleen Sgamma: Access to American Oil Provides Security

More Expert Opinions »