CONGRESS

Congress Orders TV Commercials to Become Less Annoying

Updated: December 3, 2010 | 8:08 a.m.
December 3, 2010 | 7:29 a.m.

It's a situation familiar to most TV viewers. It's the turning point of your favorite show. The two protagonists are crouched behind a crate in a warehouse, hiding from some bad guys not 20 feet away. They are whispering. So you turn up the volume. Suddenly, a cut to commercials fills the room with the sound of Peyton and Eli Manning talking at an unbearable decibel about Double Stuff Oreos. You're startled, your ears hurt, and the baby wakes up in the next room.

 

Well, fear not! Congress has a fix -- not to terrible television ads, but to the volume at which you are forced to hear them. Despite a lame-duck session mired in partisanship, the House managed to pass the Commercial Advertising Loudness Mitigation, or CALM, Act on Thursday, a bill that keeps commercials from blaring any louder than your regularly scheduled programming.  The bill passed in the Senate earlier this year and now awaits President Obama's signature. The Federal Communications Commission could start enforcing it within a year.

 

Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., sponsored the bill, and said that it was one of the most popular pieces of legislation she has worked on.

 

“Consumers have been asking for a solution to this problem for decades, and today they finally have it,” Eshoo said in a statement. Thanks to the CALM Act, “consumers will no longer have to experience being blasted at — it’s a simple fix to a huge nuisance.”

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

7:05 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »