POLITICS

All the Single Ladies

Unmarried women support Democrats by 67 percent

Updated: October 27, 2010 | 1:07 p.m.
October 26, 2010 | 2:03 p.m.

Woman's hand wearing a diamond ring. (iStockphoto)

If Democrats are looking to pick up women voters, their best bet is to focus on single women.

A new study from Women’s Voices Women Vote Action Fund and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research shows that unmarried women favor Democratic candidates by a 67 to 28 percent margin, compared to their married counterparts who lean Republican by a margin of 52 percent to 40 percent.

The survey suggest that the political geneder gap is less based on gender than on marital status. In fact, Page Gardner, president of Women’s Voices says the notion of a gender gap is a fallacy.

“The idea that you can look at women as one voting block is just wrong,” she told National Journal. “If one group of women votes largely for Democrats and another large group of women vote largely for Republicans, it doesn’t make sense for them to be considered one voting bloc.” Without the marriage gap, she said, there wouldn't be much of a gender gap to talk about.

Gardner said unmarried women support Democrats for a number of reasons including the party’s history of support for unemployment benefits and tax credits for children. The survey results carry some hope for Democrats who are trailing in many polls. Gardner said that because unmarried women tend not to focus on elections until late in the season, they are less likely to buy into the early campaign narratives. In this case it may mean that they have not yet embraced the idea that the Democrats have already lost these elections.

“This group of voters also tends to decide on candidates much later in the process which could make them the game changers this election cycle,” Gardner said in a press release.

Women’s Voices Women Vote Action Fund has bought advertising in Colorado and Maine to oppose the GOP nominee for Senate in Colorado, Ken Buck, and Maine GOP House hopeful Dean Scontras.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Most Read Articles
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »