Here’s the Strangest-Named Piece of Legislation in Congress

It actually contains a pretty intriguing idea.

National Journal
Matt Berman
June 24, 2014, 8:36 a.m.

Con­gress has way too much fun with ac­ronyms. The most egre­gious ex­ample in the House right now comes in the form a bill from Demo­crats Matt Cartwright and Rosa De­Lauro. The full name: Ve­get­ables Are Really Im­port­ant Eat­ing Tools for You. In short, the VARI­ETY Act. The bill was in­tro­duced last week and has since been re­ferred to the House Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee.

The use of “eat­ing tools” here seems to be less about us­ing broc­coli as a food shovel and more about find­ing a way to make “food” in­to two words start­ing with an E and a T to fit the ac­ronym. Be­cause VARI­FY wasn’t go­ing to cut it.

But there’s ac­tu­ally a pretty in­ter­est­ing policy idea be­hind the quirky name.

The VARI­ETY Act would ba­sic­ally ex­pand the Mas­sachu­setts-based Healthy Ini­ti­at­ives Pi­lot to all food-stamp (Sup­ple­ment­al Nu­tri­tion As­sist­ance Pro­gram, or SNAP) re­cip­i­ents. HIP, which ran in Hamp­den County from Novem­ber 2011 to Decem­ber 2012, set up an in­cent­ive sys­tem for 7,500 of the county’s SNAP-re­ceiv­ing house­holds to nudge them to buy more fruits and ve­get­ables. For every dol­lar in SNAP be­ne­fits that an en­rollee spent dur­ing this time on fruits or ve­get­ables, he or she would get 30 cents back. The in­cent­ive, which was capped at $60 per house­hold a month, could then be spent on any SNAP-eli­gible goods. The VARI­ETY Act’s ver­sion would also cap the pro­gram, but does not spe­cify an amount.

The HIP in­cent­ive worked. The Ag­ri­cul­ture De­part­ment re­leased an in­ter­im re­port last year that de­term­ined that people en­rolled in HIP ate 25 per­cent more fruits and ve­get­ables per day than people who did not par­ti­cip­ate in the pro­gram. And the pro­gram over­all wasn’t too costly: House­holds that took ad­vant­age of the pro­gram between March 2012 and Ju­ly 2012 re­ceived $5.55 in in­cent­ives per month on av­er­age — nowhere near the cap.

A re­cent study from Stan­ford found that if HIP went na­tion­al, it could in­crease con­sump­tion of fruits and ve­get­ables by a quarter-cup a day on av­er­age, doub­ling the num­ber of adults who meet the fed­er­al nu­tri­tion­al guidelines for fruit and ve­get­ables. 

With food-stamp be­ne­fits hav­ing been cut in the last six months, it’s dif­fi­cult to ima­gine a bill that would ex­pand be­ne­fits mak­ing it through Con­gress. But for the more than 46 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans who par­ti­cip­ate in SNAP, a little push to­ward fruits and ve­get­ables could go a long way. Even with the le­gis­la­tion’s ab­surd name.

What We're Following See More »
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.