Why the GOP Still Struggles With Polling

Cantor’s shocking defeat proves there’s still plenty of room for improvement.

U.S. Speaker of the House Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) (L) speaks as House Majority Leader Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) (R) looks on during a news conference after a House Republicans Conference meeting December 3, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. House GOPs held the meeting to discuss their agenda.
National Journal
Alex Roarty
June 15, 2014, 3:56 p.m.

Re­pub­lic­ans vowed to fix the polling prob­lems that plagued their 2012 cam­paigns.

It looks as though they still have some work to do.

Eric’s Can­tor’s shock­ing de­feat Tues­day is be­ing blamed on any num­ber of factors. But among the seasoned Re­pub­lic­an cam­paign op­er­at­ives, the biggest in­tern­al cul­prit is seen as the ma­jor­ity lead­er’s long­time poll­ster, John McLaugh­lin, whose sur­vey of the Vir­gin­ia race showed Can­tor lead­ing his op­pon­ent by 34 points. Can­tor went on to lose by 11 points — an un­fathom­able 45-point swing.

The er­ror was re­min­is­cent of the lit­any of polling mis­takes made by Re­pub­lic­an cam­paigns in the 2012 elec­tion, when the party’s in­tern­al data pre­dicted everything from vic­tory for Mitt Rom­ney to marked gains in the House and Sen­ate. But while those prob­lems were rooted in dif­fi­culty sur­vey­ing young and minor­ity voters, the mis­steps in Can­tor’s race un­der­score an­oth­er di­lemma for Re­pub­lic­ans: The con­tin­ued re­li­ance, by at least some of their can­did­ates, on poll­sters with poor track re­cords.

It’s not as if McLaugh­lin’s sur­veys were held in high es­teem be­fore Tues­day. His polls were routinely off the mark in 2012, miss­ing wildly in a host of pres­id­en­tial states such as Col­or­ado and Vir­gin­ia. His repu­ta­tion wasn’t good in of­fi­cial Re­pub­lic­an circles: One GOP cam­paign aide con­firmed that McLaugh­lin was not on the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Con­gres­sion­al Com­mit­tee’s list of pre­ferred poll­sters. Among GOP op­er­at­ives, his poor track re­cord was well-known.

Ex­cept, ap­par­ently, with Can­tor, who had used McLaugh­lin for years.

“Can­tor has used him for the start,” said one Re­pub­lic­an poll­ster, who re­ques­ted an­onym­ity to speak can­didly. “He did [former Vir­gin­ia Sen. George] Al­len’s cam­paign, did [former Vir­gin­ia Gov. Jim] Gilmore’s cam­paign. He’s had a long track re­cord and done a lot of oth­er things in this busi­ness; if can­did­ates work with some­body and have a good work­ing re­la­tion­ship with them, they tend to stay with them.”

“Prob­ably up un­til this point, there’s no reas­on to make a change,” the source ad­ded. “Now that there is, it’s a moot point.”

Ex­plan­a­tions for the er­ror vary. McLaugh­lin him­self told Na­tion­al Journ­al that he thought Demo­crat­ic in­ter­fer­ence had played a role, and he blamed high­er-than-ex­pec­ted turnout. Turnout was, in fact, about a third high­er than in Can­tor’s last primary, but most ana­lysts have mocked the sug­ges­tion that Demo­crats tipped the elec­tion in Dave Brat’s fa­vor. (For one, the ma­jor­ity lead­er ac­tu­ally earned few­er votes in 2014 than in 2012, des­pite the in­crease in turnout.)

McLaugh­lin was also not the only poll­ster whose polls missed the mark. In an early June sur­vey, Vox Pop­uli, a GOP polling firm that formed just this year, found Can­tor win­ning by 12 points, 52 per­cent to 40 per­cent.

Brent Seaborn, a poll­ster with Vox Pop­uli, sug­ges­ted that Brat’s late mo­mentum helped skew the race in his favo — but he also be­lieved, like McLaugh­lin, that med­dling from the oth­er party helped con­trib­ute to the er­rant poll.

“We be­lieve that Brat sig­ni­fic­antly closed the gap in the days lead­ing up to Elec­tion Day,” Seaborn said. “Ad­di­tion­ally, we be­lieve many more in­de­pend­ent and Demo­crat voters we had fa­vor­ing Brat turned out.”

The in­ac­curacies have been seized on by politicos with­in and out­side the Re­pub­lic­an Party as proof that their polls can’t be taken ser­i­ously. McLaugh­lin also polls for Rep. Jack King­ston, who is in a run­off race against former busi­ness ex­ec­ut­ive Dav­id Per­due in a fight for the GOP Sen­ate nom­in­a­tion in Geor­gia. A spokes­man for Per­due’s cam­paign mocked in­tern­al polls taken by McLaugh­lin and re­leased by the King­ston cam­paign that showed the House mem­ber lead­ing the race.

The Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee, in an email sent a day after Can­tor’s de­feat, sug­ges­ted that neither McLaugh­lin nor Vox Pop­uli should be taken ser­i­ously.

“Vox Pop­uli was off by a whop­ping 33 points. For too long, DC me­dia and elec­tion ‘fore­casters’ have taken Vox Pop­uli and McLaugh­lin ser­i­ously, in­cor­por­at­ing them in­to their Sen­ate fore­casts des­pite McLaugh­lin’s ter­rible 2012 re­cord and Vox Pop­uli’s laugh­able bi­as. Will last night’s un­be­liev­ably wrong pre­dic­tion change any­thing?”

Those con­cerns could spread to oth­er Re­pub­lic­an poll­sters.

“You’re go­ing to have a lot of people tak­ing stock of who their poll­sters are, and wheth­er their data is ac­cur­ate,” said one GOP strategist.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×