Lobbyists Warn Colleges That Participating in Sexual-Assault Survey Could Make Them Look Bad

“What will play well on TV?” lawyers for the American Council on Education ask colleges.

National Journal
Sarah Mimms
June 5, 2014, 1 a.m.

A slideshow pro­duced for a ma­jor edu­ca­tion lob­by­ing group is warn­ing col­leges that par­ti­cip­at­ing in a con­gres­sion­al sur­vey on cam­pus sexu­al as­saults could give them bad press.

After Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill’s re­quests to see a copy of a we­bin­ar the Amer­ic­an Coun­cil on Edu­ca­tion sent out to its mem­bers early last month were re­peatedly re­buffed, ac­cord­ing to her of­fice, the doc­u­ment was leaked to an edu­ca­tion blog on Tues­day. Not long after In­side High­er Ed pub­lished the slides in full, ACE made a copy avail­able to Mc­Caskill’s of­fice. A rep­res­ent­at­ive for ACE said that Mc­Caskill’s of­fice made sev­er­al re­quests for dif­fer­ent pieces of in­form­a­tion about the we­bin­ar, be­fore they sent the copy to her of­fice.

The pub­lished slides lack con­text and are not ac­com­pan­ied by any text or a tran­script of what ACE of­fi­cials said to mem­ber schools, but the mes­sage is clear: Work too closely with Con­gress on this sur­vey, or any fu­ture in­vest­ig­a­tion, and it could come back to bite your in­sti­tu­tion. The group said Thursday that they did not have a tran­script or re­cord­ing of the call that ac­com­pan­ied the we­bin­ar with its mem­ber schools, but said it was not their in­ten­tion to dis­cour­age schools from par­ti­cip­at­ing in the sur­vey.

ACE rep­res­ents 1,800 two- and four-year col­leges and uni­versit­ies, ac­cord­ing to its web­site.

Mc­Caskill, who was one of the sen­at­ors lead­ing the push for new reg­u­la­tions to com­bat sexu­al as­saults in the mil­it­ary earli­er this year, launched the sur­vey ini­ti­at­ive in April. In or­der to get an idea of how wide­spread sexu­al as­saults are on col­lege cam­puses — one fre­quently cited sur­vey says that one in five wo­men will be raped dur­ing her col­lege ca­reer — Mc­Caskill has asked 350 uni­versit­ies to par­ti­cip­ate in a sur­vey that asks, among oth­er ques­tions, how many sexu­al-as­sault in­vest­ig­a­tions they’ve con­duc­ted in the last five years. (You can see a sample copy of the sur­vey here.)

Some of those schools — though ACE would not say how many or name them — par­ti­cip­ated in a we­bin­ar and call with the lob­by­ing group in early May. ACE says that they were try­ing to lay out the pro­cess and dif­fi­culties of a con­gres­sion­al in­vest­ig­a­tion, not warn schools against par­ti­cip­at­ing in the sur­vey.

But the slides in­clude the cau­tion: “Sur­veys provide fod­der for ad­di­tion­al [con­gres­sion­al] in­vest­ig­a­tion.”

They then go on to warn col­leges and uni­versit­ies that the po­ten­tial scope of a con­gres­sion­al in­quiry is es­sen­tially lim­it­less. In­vest­ig­a­tions con­duc­ted by Con­gress, they say, are polit­ic­ally mo­tiv­ated, char­ac­ter­ized by a “Wild West” ap­proach “without real rules,” sub­ject to leaks to the press, and lack­ing safe­guards for their sub­jects (in­clud­ing at­tor­ney-cli­ent priv­ilege and right of ap­peal). The doc­u­ments do not men­tion, however, that at­tor­ney-cli­ent-priv­ilege claims are hold­ing up the House in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to the scan­dal at the Vet­er­ans Af­fairs De­part­ment.

The slides also ad­vise schools that con­fid­en­ti­al­ity in the sur­vey and po­ten­tial in­vest­ig­a­tion pro­cess is not guar­an­teed, not­ing that mem­bers could hold press con­fer­ences on the pro­ceed­ings. It also ad­vises them to con­sider: “What will play well on TV?”

Mc­Caskill has told all 350 in­sti­tu­tions that the sur­vey will be com­pletely con­fid­en­tial and is not re­leas­ing any of the names of par­ti­cip­at­ing schools.

A Mc­Caskill spokes­wo­man told Na­tion­al Journ­al that some of the schools in­volved in the sur­vey re­por­ted that they felt they were “be­ing warned against co­oper­at­ing.” The sen­at­or’s of­fice is now point­ing to the ACE slides as the cul­prit, though they would not provide the names of any of the par­ti­cip­at­ing schools either.

“It was ab­so­lutely noth­ing we said to in­struct schools to not re­spond to the sur­vey. “¦ Non-co­oper­a­tion would have been a bad strategy,” Cov­ing­ton & Burl­ing part­ner Robert Kel­ner, whose firm pro­duced the slides, said Wed­nes­day.

Kel­ner and ACE gen­er­al coun­sel Ada Meloy both said that the odds of a school be­ing in­vest­ig­ated would go up sig­ni­fic­antly if they did not par­ti­cip­ate in the sur­vey. Kel­ner ad­ded that it would be “fool­ish” not to do so. But neither could say con­fid­ently that that mes­sage was con­veyed to schools on the call.

Kel­ner said that the as­sump­tion of the call was that schools would par­ti­cip­ate, but ad­ded that be­cause the call was for a broad vari­ety of schools, not a spe­cif­ic cli­ent, his firm would not have giv­en any ad­vice on the sur­vey one way or the oth­er. Cov­ing­ton & Burl­ing provided the con­tact in­form­a­tion for three of its at­tor­neys at the end of the slideshow for any schools con­cerned about the leg­al rami­fic­a­tions of an­swer­ing the sur­vey and re­spond­ing to fu­ture con­gres­sion­al in­quir­ies.

“We’d cer­tainly hope mov­ing for­ward that ACE will be more will­ing to work pro­duct­ively with us and its mem­ber in­sti­tu­tions to help com­bat sexu­al as­sault on our col­lege cam­puses,” Mc­Caskill spokes­wo­man Sarah Feld­man said in a state­ment.

Meloy said that her group is happy to con­tin­ue work­ing with Mc­Caskill on re­du­cing sexu­al as­saults on col­lege cam­puses. “We cer­tainly are aligned with her in that de­sire and we’ve giv­en her sev­er­al op­tions of op­por­tun­it­ies to get her mes­sage to our mem­ber or­gan­iz­a­tions,” Meloy said.

This post was up­dated at 6:45 p.m. Wed­nes­day with fur­ther com­ments from ACE and Cov­ing­ton & Burl­ing.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×