CONGRESS

Scientists Join Opposition to Stock Act Disclosure Requirements

July 2, 2012 | 9:28 p.m.

Government Executive is part of the National Journal Group Inc. and the Atlantic Media Company. From time to time, Government Executive and National Journal will share content and collaborate on features and events.

A group representing scientists has come out against provisions of the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act that force senior executives to share their personal investments in an online database, calling the requirements an unfair and unnecessary invasion of privacy.

The Association of Scientists, which represents scientists in the National Institutes of Health and others receiving federal research grants, said the law will put its members at risk for identity theft and will drive top scholars to the private sector, where they can have more privacy. The organization said the requirements that were in effect prior to the April 4 signing of the Stock Act are sufficient, and the new provisions are creating superfluous administrative tasks that take away from accomplishing real work.

The group wrote a letter on Monday to the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee—Sens. Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, respectively—to voice its concerns.

“The Assembly of Scientists supports the STOCK Act’s stand against insider trading, which is illegal and immoral,” the group wrote in the letter. “But we are very concerned that the STOCK Act creates burdens that we believe are deleterious to the ability of NIH and other U.S. institutions of science to best accomplish their missions.”

The organization argued existing federal law prohibits its 600 members from regulating, consulting with and making public policy for private industry. The disclosures, they argued, therefore are unnecessary.

The Senior Executives Association also has voiced opposition to these Stock Act provisions.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
New Faces of the 113th Congress
Most Read Articles
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

8:23 p.m.

Latest Response by William O'Keefe: LNG: A Rising Tide Does Raise All Boats

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

6:39 p.m.

Latest Response by Laura Barrett: P3s Must Be Accountable to Public

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

5:16 p.m.

Latest Response by Marlo Lewis: Central Planning: Bad Export Policy

More Expert Opinions »