CONGRESS

Report: Senate Working on Sequester Deal

Updated: October 2, 2012 | 8:58 a.m.
October 2, 2012 | 8:49 a.m.

Lawmakers and aides say a bipartisan group of senators is working on a “three-step process” for the lame duck session to avoid the automatic sequester cuts set for January, The New York Times reports.

While the two sides remain far apart, the senators are considering a deficit reduction target of about $4 trillion over 10 years, to be achieved by raising revenue from an overhaul of the tax code, savings in Medicare and Social Security, and cuts to other federal programs, The Times reported.

An alternate plan would mirror the recommendations of the Simpson-Bowles debt commission. Lastly, the sequestration cuts could be put off with a “deficit reduction down payment,” as The Times puts it, meant to show “how serious Congress is.”

Lawmakers have a direct incentive to avoid the automatic sequestration cuts, as Roll Call reports:  Congress itself has some skin in the game. Some $101 million would be trimmed from House salaries and expenses next year, and $32 million would be cut from Senators’ personnel and office expenses.

With the blessing of both parties' leadership, Senators Michael Bennet, D-Colo., and Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., have "begun talks on legislative language to lock a deficit reduction framework into law," The Times wrote.

“A lot of what happens and when it happens depends on the outcome of the election,” Senator Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky told The Times.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
New Faces of the 113th Congress
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

33 minutes ago

Latest Response by Jack Rafuse: The LNG Export Conundrum: Dow Chemical

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:23 p.m.

Latest Response by Bernard L. Weinstein: Export more LNG to fight climate change

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:14 p.m.

Latest Response by Bernard L. Weinstein: Export more LNG to fight climate change

More Expert Opinions »