GWEN'S TAKE

The Truth of Gun Politics: No One Has Good Answers

Updated: December 21, 2012 | 1:43 p.m.
December 21, 2012 | 1:42 p.m.

A school bus in Newtown, Conn., carries participants of a memorial vigil for the victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. ((AP Photo/David Goldman))

I think it's fair to say we have all been crying for a week.

Watching the faces of the victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting scroll by, in silence, at the end of the PBS NewsHour on Monday night was excruciating.

I tried to escape by doing some Christmas shopping. Cashiers asked me what the shooter's mother was thinking.

I talked to normally smooth-talking lawmakers to ask what they would do. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who became mayor of San Francisco after her predecessor was killed in a City Hall shooting, seethed. Now the chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, she is pushing for a new ban on military-style assault weapons.

interviewed Mark Warner, a senator from Virginia who has often boasted of the "A" rating he regularly receives from the National Rifle Association. But when his college-age daughters came home after the Newtown shootings and asked him what he was going to do about it, he realized he didn't have a good answer.

Then I sat down across from Education Secretary Arne Duncan on Thursday morning, and I realized no one has good answers.

Duncan, a rangy former basketball player who grew up in Chicago and served as superintendent of that city's schools, is part of the task force President Obama has formed to come up with a federal response to gun violence. He noticed when the president, in his public remarks mourning the Newtown massacre victims, made a point of talking about gun violence in other places as well — on Chicago street corners, in Topeka, in an Alabama hospital.

The problem, he said, is so much bigger than whether Americans should have the right to bear arms. Which Americans? Which guns? Concealed or openly?

For Duncan, the answers to these questions are deeply personal. He can actually name the people he knows who have been shot to death.

"Gun violence has haunted me my entire life" he told me, his voice shaking. "Growing up as part of my mother’s inner-city tutoring program, I had a lot of mentors, good friends I grew up with, shot dead when I was growing up."

He called individuals by name, describing one young woman who was killed in her living room with the shots from an AK-47, and another young man who was killed at 2:30 in the afternoon on the bus headed home from school.

"So this is not a new problem," he said. "This is something that I’ve battled with and tried to understand from the time I was a little boy. And I think it’s time to do something about that."

But what? For all the force of emotion we have endured since the Sandy Hook shootings, a distinct strain of pessimism still runs through Washington. Yes, the massacre was horrific, but we have heard vows to act before. I remember the shock after former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was attacked, and when students were sent fleeing for their lives at Virginia Tech.

Everyone agrees that this time things will be different. Things seldom are, for long.

Changing the world is complicated. Making new laws and achieving compromise requires nuance. Washington — whether it be its media universe or its political one — is not particularly good at the gray areas.

But I can't forget the look in the eye of one of the Newtown residents who spoke to the NewsHour's Hari Sreenivasan this week.

"We have seen this happen too many times," Linda Lubinsky said. "You can run down the list of the places. And haven't we learned from that? Did we really have to lose 20 more children and seven more adults? I mean, enough. Stop. Come on.”

"What else do we need? " she asked. "Are we going to continue to let an industry control killing? And that's not the town, the country that I want to live in."

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Most Read Articles
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

6:25 p.m.

Latest Response by Jack Rafuse: The LNG Export Conundrum: Dow Chemical

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:23 p.m.

Latest Response by Bernard L. Weinstein: Export more LNG to fight climate change

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:14 p.m.

Latest Response by Bernard L. Weinstein: Export more LNG to fight climate change

More Expert Opinions »