POLITICS

The Supreme Court Kabuki Dance

The battle over Sotomayor is no more than a ritualistic rehearsal.

Updated: February 16, 2011 | 9:05 a.m.
May 30, 2009

Watching conservatives work themselves into a lather on cable TV over Sonia Sotomayor is amusing. Supreme Court nominees are almost always confirmed, particularly if the president's party has a decisive majority in the Senate. Plus, Sotomayor is a liberal who would replace a liberal, David Souter.

This seems to make little difference to the noisemakers. Although Sotomayor might well end up somewhat more liberal than Souter on certain issues, we are talking about gradations, not any significant shift in the Court's balance.

Republicans must seize this process as an opportunity to galvanize their base. However, doing so risks alienating Hispanic voters.

All of this is a ritualistic Kabuki dance, a rehearsal for the no-holds-barred brawl we can expect if one of the four conservatives on the Court retires while Barack Obama is president. But the average age of those four is under 62, while the four more liberal justices average almost 77. Anthony Kennedy, the swing vote, is 72; the liberals are John Paul Stevens, 89; Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 76; and Stephen Breyer, 70. The oldest of the conservatives, 73-year-old Antonin Scalia, seems to be having a grand time on the bench and shows no desire to depart any time soon. The others are Clarence Thomas, 60; Samuel Alito, 59; and John Roberts, 54, the chief justice.

Last year, University of Chicago law professor William Landes and U.S. Circuit Judge Richard Posner completed a statistical analysis of the voting patterns of all the justices who have served since 1937. It showed that four of the five most conservative justices to have served in the past seven decades are currently on the Court: Thomas was the most conservative, followed by Scalia, Roberts, and Alito. The fifth was the last chief justice, William Rehnquist.

According to The New York Times, Justice Stevens declared in 2007 that everyone "who's been appointed to the Court since Lewis Powell [in 1971] has been more conservative than his or her predecessor," adding that Ginsburg, who replaced Byron White, might be the sole exception.

That pattern could well be broken if one of the conservatives departs during the Obama administration. Yet even if Obama gets more than his share of Supreme Court picks, he will probably have more opportunities to replace liberals than to decisively affect the Court's direction by filling the seats now occupied by conservatives.

Although Sotomayor's confirmation might not have an enormous impact on the Court's balance, Republicans' reaction to her nomination could have major political consequences. After suffering massive losses in the 2006 and 2008 elections, Republicans and conservative groups can ill afford to roll over and play dead. They must seize this confirmation process as an opportunity to galvanize their base. However, doing so risks alienating Hispanic voters, who recoiled at all the party's immigrant-bashing in recent years.

In the 1988 and 1992 presidential elections, GOP nominee George H.W. Bush pulled only 30 percent and 25 percent of the Hispanic vote. In 1996, Bob Dole garnered just 21 percent. In his two presidential races, George W. Bush reversed the trend, picking up 35 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2000 and 43 percent in 2004.

In the years that followed, to the consternation of George W. Bush, Karl Rove, and Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the anti-immigrant rhetoric from many Republicans grew louder and harsher. As a result, McCain's presidential bid attracted only 31 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2008, despite his representing a state with a substantial Hispanic population and having been very much a moderate in the immigration wars.

The size of the Hispanic vote tripled to 9 percent of the electorate between 1988 and 2008. The Times' Adam Nagourney has quoted Bush 43 strategist Matthew Dowd as saying that Republicans now need at least 40 percent of the Hispanic vote to be competitive nationally -- up from his 2000 estimate of 35 percent. For the week of May 18-24, Gallup's nightly tracking poll pegged Obama's job-approval rating among Hispanics at 78 percent. Nominating Sotomayor can't possibly hurt him there.

In the dance that has just begun, everyone has a well-rehearsed role. Activists on the far left and right live for these moments. They can raise money, recruit supporters, and shout on TV. I'll be more interested when I see a confirmation fight that truly matters.

This article appears in the May 30, 2009, edition of National Journal.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Printable Edition
Click here for a printable edition of this week's magazine.
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

No Wonder Republican Criticism of Obama Isn’t Working

8:05 p.m.
They’re attacking the president where he’s least vulnerable at a time when they have minimal credibility.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Smaller Schools Aren’t Always Better

8:05 p.m.
The universities best able to expand access to education are the ones with the most students.
Reid Wilson: On the Trail

Parties Push For House Retirements

May 23, 2013
Campaign committees utilize scare tactics to pressure members to step aside.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

5:16 p.m.

Latest Response by Phineas Baxandall: It's About Waste, Not Hate

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

3:19 p.m.

Latest Response by James Corless: Time to adapt to the new reality

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

11:51 a.m.

Latest Response by Bill Cooper: U.S. Should Quickly Approve Other Apps

More Expert Opinions »