COMMON SENSE

What's the Big Secret?

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton responds to the leak of classified cables by WikiLeaks. (JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)

Both conservatives and progressives seem hypocritical in their views on WikiLeaks.

Updated: December 6, 2010 | 12:40 p.m.
December 6, 2010 | 12:35 p.m.

It’s funny. Based on the viral response to my column last week on WikiLeaks, you would have thought I was giving away classified information myself. This column has generated more hits and interest than any video or column I have ever posted. Wow. Certainly struck a chord out there.
 
The overwhelming set of comments, especially on Huffington Post and in e-mails sent directly to me, were very positive -- many along the lines (which had to make me laugh) that “I never thought I would agree with Dowd, but I am posting this anyway.”    
 
I think there is a hunger in America and the world for truth and for leaders to be more frank, and a terrible distrust in government and its ability to reflect our deepest hopes, dreams, and concerns. And this distrust, though manifested in different ways, exists both for folks on the conservative side and on the progressive side, which is why I think openness and telling the truth is viewed as such a powerful value at this time.
 
I do have to smile, though, when I think about some conservatives and Republicans who criticize WikiLeaks and me for advocating more truth in our discourse and less state involvement in secrets. Aren’t they the ones arguing that the government can’t be trusted with our money? So the feds can be trusted with national security secrets and make decisions on important classification levels, but can’t be trusted with Medicare funds?
 
And conversely, I laugh when many progressives celebrate my column and WikiLeaks' release of information because government is some sort of cabal of corporate and authoritarian interests. Don't these same progressives want government more involved in our lives on health care and medical decisions?
 
I do think this discussion is very healthy and shows a tremendous hunger for more transparency and information in the public sphere, even if you disagree with Julian Assange’s way of doing business. One thing is certain. You can add WikiLeaks to a list that includes Sarah Palin: Mention either of those these days, and you're sure to generate some buzz. 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Printable Edition
Click here for a printable edition of this week's magazine.
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

49 minutes ago

Latest Response by Paul Sullivan: Wake up to Competition and Opportunity

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

11:00 a.m.

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Nat Gas: Exports are Not the Only Issue

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

10:58 a.m.

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Nat Gas: Exports are Not the Only Issue

More Expert Opinions »