COMMON SENSE

What Romney Must Do in the Debates

Establishing competence, compassion, and connection can start a 'comeback' narrative.

Updated: October 1, 2012 | 10:29 a.m.
September 28, 2012 | 4:07 p.m.

Mitt Romney pauses as supporters cheer to remarks during a rally Friday, Sept. 21, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)

On the road to recovery, one must always accept reality and the truth as it exists — not what we want it to be, but what it is. The reality is that Mitt Romney is behind in the presidential race right now — nationally and in nearly every key battleground state. This race today is not within the margin of error, no matter how many attacks his supporters wage on the integrity of public polling.

It would be much better for the Romney campaign to admit this and then, once out of denial, to make the necessary course corrections. I estimate that, right now, Romney is down nationally by about 5 percentage points. And in critical states — from Florida to Virginia to Ohio —  he is probably down by roughly the same margin.

The good news for Romney is that the equilibrium of this race is probably a 2- or 3-point margin, both nationally and in the key battleground states. This is likely where this race will return after the first debate if Romney performs reasonably well.

In preparing for the debates, Romney (and President Obama) needs to remember that judgments on winning or losing are much more stylistic than substantive. The public isn’t interested in getting more-detailed policy specifics, but in getting pointers about the people onstage. When debates have moved numbers in the past, it has been result of impressions, mannerisms, and style. (As an aside, Obama will be judged a loser if he comes across as aloof, arrogant, impatient or irritable.)

Romney should remember that winning — or even just doing well -- requires understanding that voters will see these debates through a prism of the letter “C.” It will be a comparison and contrast of the candidates on three parameters: competence, compassion, and connection. Romney has suffered recently because of a perceived lack of these qualities, and that explains why he is behind.

His too-quick-on-the draw accusation related to the Libya tragedy allowed some voters to question his competence. The “47 percent” video — along with an existing narrative of him not understanding average voters’ concerns — has made him look less than compassionate. And his campaigning and manner too often have made him seem disconnected from the public.

In this first debate (and the subsequent two), Romney needs to rebuild all of these, on issues ranging from the economy to foreign policy, and to reestablish his presence in this race. This is a tall order, but doable. If he can accomplish this, he will close the gap with Obama and the media will write the "Romney comeback" story for at least a few days. If he has any chance of winning at this point, he needs that oxygen.

This race is still winnable for Romney because of voters’ dissatisfaction with the country’s direction, but the window is closing soon. The presidential race has gone from a probable victory for him a few months ago to a possible one today, but the outlook is slowly moving to unlikely.

If Romney wants to win, this is the moment to focus on those three C's. Otherwise, he’ll need to focus on another “C” on Nov. 6: concession.

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Printable Edition
Click here for a printable edition of this week's magazine.
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:49 p.m.

Latest Response by Dave McCurdy: Natural Gas Market Will Find Balance

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

4:24 p.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: We Need a New Policy for a New Day

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

3:21 p.m.

Latest Response by Tim Peckinpaugh: LNG Exports: Let the Market Decide

More Expert Opinions »