COMMON SENSE

Much at Stake for Romney With Debate Audience

A TelePrompTer appears from behind the stage during a rehearsal for a presidential debate, Tuesday, Oct. 2, 2012, at the University of Denver in Denver. President Barack Obama and Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney will hold their first debate Wednesday. (AP Photo/David Goldman)

Updated: October 3, 2012 | 11:10 a.m.
October 2, 2012 | 3:21 p.m.

As I watched my hometown Detroit Tigers clinch their division last night (Awesome!), I noticed the two teams with different colored Sox were not making the playoffs and basically ending a very disappointing season. The Chicago White Sox (President Obama’s team) and the Boston Red Sox (Gov. Romney’s team) were ending their year not meeting expectations and underperforming. The hometown teams seem to perfectly represent two unelectable candidates running against each other, though in this case they are the only teams in the playoffs, so one will win.

Obama is handicapped by an anemic economy and many in the country question his leadership. Nearly two-thirds of voters think the country is on the wrong track, according to the polls. Romney is not well-liked by voters, doesn’t connect well, and people don’t think he understands their lives or their problems.

So as each candidate faces a pivotal moment at the presidential debate on Wednesday in Denver, how will success by judged? Each campaign has tried to set expectations for this debate, though in the end, each performance will be judged more on style than on substance by the two key audiences each needs to influence. The manners of the man will matter more than the banners of his plans. 

Audience No. 1 is made up of the independent voters who are either still undecided (Really? I have stood in line behind folks like you at restaurants and it does get frustrating), or softly affiliated with Obama. At this point, Romney not only needs to convince undecided voters, he also must move voters from Obama to himself — a more difficult task. 

Romney is positioned well to meet or exceed expectations of this audience. All polling, by nearly 2-to-1 ratios, shows that voters think Obama will win the debates. This sets things up well for Romney, who if he just shows up, is forceful and compassionate, strings some coherent sentences together, and stands up to Obama, will exceed expectations and move some numbers initially among voters. The bar isn’t very high for him with independents. Obama, on the other hand, is already presumed to be the winner by this audience, and is unlikely to meet expectations. 

Audience No. 2 is a more difficult one for Mitt Romney. This audience is made up of the media and the various and many pundits who will comment and analyze the debate (and yep, yours truly is one of them). This audience believes Romney needs to have a game-changing moment or two that dramatically alters the contours of this race. This audience believes the pressure is on Romney and he needs to win overwhelmingly to have a chance in a race in which he lags behind in battleground states.

This is not an impossible task, but it is much more difficult than his situation with Audience No. 1. Obama, on the other hand, has an easier job here because the media believe he is ahead, and that as long as he doesn’t offend folks with his style or manner, the debate could be the beginning of him putting the race away. However, if he does do something stylistically off, the media will pounce. This is the best-case scenario for Romney.

My expectation is that Romney will do reasonably well with Audience No. 1 (independent voters) and move some polling to his advantage at least initially. But after a few days, if he doesn’t meet the bar of Audience No. 2, the multiplier effect of the media conversation will tamp down any movement.  All of this is just a guess, and one of the great things about debates is that there still is some mystery and opportunity for an unexpected result.

And finally my last piece of advice to the candidates and campaigns is the same advice I give my children: Tell the truth, respect others, have some fun, enjoy the moment, the sun rises tomorrow no matter what happens today, and have faith that as long as you follow your gut, you know it will turn out for the best.

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Most Read Articles
Printable Edition
Click here for a printable edition of this week's magazine.
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »