What Are the Offers on the Fiscal Cliff?

Just the numbers. Plain and simple (well, not that simple).

Updated: December 4, 2012 | 3:40 p.m.
December 4, 2012 | 3:17 p.m.

House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio gestures as he speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 29, 2012, after private talks with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on the fiscal cliff negotiations. Boehner said no substantive progress has been made between the White House and the House" in the past two weeks. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)   (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

There are four weeks left until we fall off (or slam into, pick your metaphor) the $600 billion fiscal cliff, and the parties find themselves at a stiff impasse. In the last few days, Rep. John Boehner and President Obama have scoffed at each other's cliff solutions. The speaker said the White House's offer was in "la-la land," objecting to the president's proposed tax hike on the wealthy. The White House said the Republican plan didn't provide enough balance, insisting a plan that only raises revenue from closing tax loopholes is not feasible. In short, the two sides aren't on the same page.

And the dealings get more complicated than Republicans vs. Democrats. John Boehner's plan has already come under fire from conservative groups for being too compromising on tax deducations.

So let's simplify this story into it's most basic part: What are the fiscal cliff propsals on the table?

Obama's Offer



  • $1.6 trillion in new revenue by increasing tax rates on income over $250,000 a year.
  • $600 billion in cuts to entitlements.
  • $200 billion in economic stimulus. According to CNN, these could include extending the payroll tax cut, extending unemployment insurance, and funding infrastructure projects.

GOP Offer



  • $800 billion in revenue from tax reform. Republicans want to close certain loopholes and deductions, meanwhile reducing rates overall.
  • $1.4 trillion in savings

    -$600 billion savings in changes to Medicare and Medicaid.

    -$300 billion in mandatory program cuts.

    -$200 billion savings from tying the way the government establishes salaries and benefits to the consumer price index.

    -$300 billion in discretionary spending cuts.

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content

 

Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »