What Are the Offers on the Fiscal Cliff?

Just the numbers. Plain and simple (well, not that simple).

Updated: December 4, 2012 | 3:40 p.m.
December 4, 2012 | 3:17 p.m.

House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio gestures as he speaks to reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, Nov. 29, 2012, after private talks with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on the fiscal cliff negotiations. Boehner said no substantive progress has been made between the White House and the House" in the past two weeks. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)   (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

There are four weeks left until we fall off (or slam into, pick your metaphor) the $600 billion fiscal cliff, and the parties find themselves at a stiff impasse. In the last few days, Rep. John Boehner and President Obama have scoffed at each other's cliff solutions. The speaker said the White House's offer was in "la-la land," objecting to the president's proposed tax hike on the wealthy. The White House said the Republican plan didn't provide enough balance, insisting a plan that only raises revenue from closing tax loopholes is not feasible. In short, the two sides aren't on the same page.

And the dealings get more complicated than Republicans vs. Democrats. John Boehner's plan has already come under fire from conservative groups for being too compromising on tax deducations.

So let's simplify this story into it's most basic part: What are the fiscal cliff propsals on the table?

Obama's Offer



  • $1.6 trillion in new revenue by increasing tax rates on income over $250,000 a year.
  • $600 billion in cuts to entitlements.
  • $200 billion in economic stimulus. According to CNN, these could include extending the payroll tax cut, extending unemployment insurance, and funding infrastructure projects.

GOP Offer



  • $800 billion in revenue from tax reform. Republicans want to close certain loopholes and deductions, meanwhile reducing rates overall.
  • $1.4 trillion in savings

    -$600 billion savings in changes to Medicare and Medicaid.

    -$300 billion in mandatory program cuts.

    -$200 billion savings from tying the way the government establishes salaries and benefits to the consumer price index.

    -$300 billion in discretionary spending cuts.

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Most Read Articles

 

Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

No Wonder Republican Criticism of Obama Isn’t Working

May 23, 2013
They’re attacking the president where he’s least vulnerable at a time when they have minimal credibility.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Smaller Schools Aren’t Always Better

May 23, 2013
The universities best able to expand access to education are the ones with the most students.
Reid Wilson: On the Trail

Parties Push For House Retirements

May 23, 2013
Campaign committees utilize scare tactics to pressure members to step aside.
More Columns »