DEBT CEILING

The Norquist-Approved Tax Deal That’s Not In The Debt Talks—Yet

Updated: July 15, 2011 | 11:20 a.m.
July 14, 2011 | 4:53 p.m.

Anti-tax-hike champion spoke at National Journal July 14, 2011.  (RICHARD A. BLOOM)

A mechanism that would let Republicans raise taxes as part of a debt limit agreement has the approval of the party’s top anti-tax enforcer but has yet to garner support among GOP lawmakers.

The plan, which would fund long-term tax relief for the middle class with as much as a $1 trillion in new revenues found by closing tax loopholes, could have been the cornerstone of a grand fiscal bargain.

From National Journal:
PICTURES: Who’s On Murdoch's Payroll?


4 Paths the Fed Could Take if Economy Gets Worse

Cantor: Obama Stormed Out of Debt-Ceiling Talks

PICTURES: Where the Obamas Eat in D.C.

PICTURES: Remembering Betty Ford

“If you incorporate an extension for some period of time for the middle end, it would be a done deal,” an administration official, speaking anonymously because of the sensitivity of the negotiations, told National Journal. ”You never know what re-emerges.”

Grover Norquist, head of Americans for Tax Reform, which promotes an anti-tax pledge signed by nearly every single federally elected Republican, told National Journal on Thursday that the plan wouldn’t violate his organization’s principles.

Congress annually borrows money to exempt the middle class from the effects of the Alternative Minimum Tax, which was instituted in 1970 to collar high-earning tax evaders but now affects a much broader share of the population. Linking a long-term exemption to closed tax loopholes would meet Republican standards for tax reform and generate $700 billion in real deficit savings.

“We could trade you deductions and credits in return for an AMT fix … as long as, over the same period of time, it’s at least the same amount of money,” Norquist said. “You can’t trade a temporary tax cut for a permanent tax increase, but if they’re both permanent or they’re both temporary, that works. And that may yet be something you do.”

On the Hill, some Republicans remained open to the concept, but one, Rep. Allen West, R-Fla., warned that “just because Grover Norquist said it, doesn’t make it gospel.”

 


 

Ben Terris contributed

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal

 

Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »