BUDGET

DeMint: End Subsidies for Public Broadcasting

Senator lists salaries of top executives in column.

Updated: March 4, 2011 | 8:00 a.m.
March 4, 2011 | 7:33 a.m.

When conservative firebrand Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., looks at public broadcasting, he sees a scam. Or, as he puts it in a Wall Street Journal op-ed today, “When presidents of government-funded broadcasting are making more than the president of the United States, it's time to get the government out of public broadcasting.”

“The so-called commercial free public airwaves have been filled with pleas for taxpayer cash,” DeMint writes. And, he adds, lobbying by the Public Broadcasting Service and National Public Radio will “prevent Congress from saving hundreds of millions of dollars each year by cutting their subsidies”

Critics of the effort to end funding for public broadcasting point out that those subsidies are mere pennies in the federal government’s budget, but some conservatives say that’s not the point – it’s like families cutting their “latte budgets.”

DeMint points out that even though PBS President Paula Kerger took to the airwaves to plead for continued public funds, she manages to make $632,233 in annual compensation. “Surely it can operate without tax dollars,” he writes.

“The best way to stop the ‘partisan meddling’ in public broadcasting that MoveOn.org complains about,” he argues, “is by ending the taxpayers' obligation to pay for it. The politics will be out of public broadcasting as soon as the government gets out of the business of paying for it.”

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


More By This Writer
Katy O'Donnell's Pic
Katy O'Donnell | Staff Writer, Budget, Taxes, and Trade
kodonnell@nationaljournal.com
Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content

 

Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »