ECONOMY

Axelrod Denies Obama Would Concede Tax Cuts

But he allows room for negotiations.

Updated: November 11, 2010 | 4:03 p.m.
November 11, 2010 | 8:48 a.m.

White House senior advisor David Axelrod and outgoing Director of the White House National Economic Council Larry Summers. (MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)

Updated at 10:49 a.m. on November 11.

Senior White House adviser David Axelrod said this morning that President Obama has not caved to GOP demands on the extension of the Bush tax cuts, despite a report to the contrary.

“We're willing to discuss how we move forward,” Axelrod said in an e-mail to National Journal rebutting a Huffington Post story. “But we believe that it's imperative to extend the tax cuts for the middle class, and don't believe we can afford a permanent extension of tax cuts for the wealthy.”

The Huffington Post reported this morning that Axelrod suggested that “the administration is ready to accept and across-the-board continuation of steep Bush-era tax cuts, including those for the wealthiest taxpayers.”

In the article, Axelrod is quoted as saying, “We have to deal with the world as we find it.”

Speaker-to-be John Boehner was, unsurprisingly, pleased by the news. His press secretary, Michael Steel, was quick to react to the story this morning.

“Republicans made a pledge to America to permanently stop all of the tax hikes scheduled for January 1,” Steel said. “We're glad to see that the president's most trusted adviser now agrees with this course of action, and hope he and the president will show leadership by convincing Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi to stop these tax hikes permanently in the upcoming lame-duck session."

Republican legislators had balked at the administration’s preelection trial balloon of “decoupling” the upper- and middle-income breaks to allow for separate votes -- theoretically paving the way for a permanent extension of the middle-income cuts and just a temporary extension for the top 2 percent of earners.

But after the drubbing Democrats took last week in the midterm elections, Obama said he was open to compromise. In a postelection news conference, Obama made clear that tax cuts for the middle class were a priority, warning Republicans that “brinksmanship” over them would not stand. There had been speculation the GOP might hold middle-class cuts hostage to ensure the passage of all cuts.

“The single most important thing I think we need to do economically -- and this is something that has to be done during the lame-duck session -- is making sure that taxes don't go up on middle-class families next year,” Obama said.

While he argued that the middle class is more likely “to spend that money” than the wealthy, Obama said he was “absolutely” open to negotiation on the cuts.

Aamer Madhani contributed

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


More By This Writer
Katy O'Donnell's Pic
Katy O'Donnell | Staff Writer, Budget, Taxes, and Trade
kodonnell@nationaljournal.com
Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Most Read Articles

 

Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »