ECONOMY

Axelrod Denies Obama Would Concede Tax Cuts

MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images

White House senior advisor David Axelrod and outgoing Director of the White House National Economic Council Larry Summers.

But he allows room for negotiations.

Updated: November 11, 2010 | 4:03 p.m.
November 11, 2010 | 8:48 a.m.

Updated at 10:49 a.m. on November 11.

Senior White House adviser David Axelrod said this morning that President Obama has not caved to GOP demands on the extension of the Bush tax cuts, despite a report to the contrary.

“We're willing to discuss how we move forward,” Axelrod said in an e-mail to National Journal rebutting a Huffington Post story. “But we believe that it's imperative to extend the tax cuts for the middle class, and don't believe we can afford a permanent extension of tax cuts for the wealthy.”

The Huffington Post reported this morning that Axelrod suggested that “the administration is ready to accept and across-the-board continuation of steep Bush-era tax cuts, including those for the wealthiest taxpayers.”

In the article, Axelrod is quoted as saying, “We have to deal with the world as we find it.”

Speaker-to-be John Boehner was, unsurprisingly, pleased by the news. His press secretary, Michael Steel, was quick to react to the story this morning.

“Republicans made a pledge to America to permanently stop all of the tax hikes scheduled for January 1,” Steel said. “We're glad to see that the president's most trusted adviser now agrees with this course of action, and hope he and the president will show leadership by convincing Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi to stop these tax hikes permanently in the upcoming lame-duck session."

Republican legislators had balked at the administration’s preelection trial balloon of “decoupling” the upper- and middle-income breaks to allow for separate votes -- theoretically paving the way for a permanent extension of the middle-income cuts and just a temporary extension for the top 2 percent of earners.

But after the drubbing Democrats took last week in the midterm elections, Obama said he was open to compromise. In a postelection news conference, Obama made clear that tax cuts for the middle class were a priority, warning Republicans that “brinksmanship” over them would not stand. There had been speculation the GOP might hold middle-class cuts hostage to ensure the passage of all cuts.

“The single most important thing I think we need to do economically -- and this is something that has to be done during the lame-duck session -- is making sure that taxes don't go up on middle-class families next year,” Obama said.

While he argued that the middle class is more likely “to spend that money” than the wealthy, Obama said he was “absolutely” open to negotiation on the cuts.

Aamer Madhani contributed

Want to stay ahead of the curve? Sign up for National Journal’s AM & PM Must Reads. News and analysis to ensure you don’t miss a thing.

Leave a Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
  • NationalJournal on Twitter
  • NationalJournal on Facebook
  • NationalJournal on Tumblr
  • NationalJournal's RSS Feeds
  • NationalJournal's Email Newsletters
  • NationalJournal on iPhone and iPad

 

Columns
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

The Emerging Democratic Divide

9:30 p.m.
The brouhaha over a moderate New Jersey mayor’s comments has aggravated tensions that have been growing within the party’s coalition.
Charlie Cook: Charlie Cook's Off to the Races

If It Hits the Fan

May 21, 2012
Europe’s economy is in a tailspin and China’s is slowing. Our political system is a mess. Who are voters going to blame if it all goes bad? Not just Obama.
Gwen Ifill: Gwen's Take

History's Romance: Why Politics Past Beats Politics Present

May 21, 2012

Is it just my imagination, or have politics and politicians grown smaller?

More Columns »

The Next Economy: Gender Wars

In the job market, will women ever win?

Get a trial subscription to National Journal magazine.