GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS

Agencies to Release Plans for Streamlined Regulations

Updated: August 23, 2011 | 9:54 a.m.
August 23, 2011 | 8:34 a.m.

The government agencies and departments tasked by President Obama earlier this year with streamlining their regulatory requirements will release their final plans on Tuesday, The Wall Street Journal reports.

The plans are in part a response to criticism that the Obama administration hasn't given business concerns enough consideration. But some business leaders don’t think they go far enough. “Each of the proposals seems to be efficient, technical changes, but it doesn't make any impact on the overall regulatory burdens that exist on the business community,” Bill Kovacs, a senior vice president at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, told The Journal.

“We will continue to eliminate unjustified regulatory costs—and thus to strengthen our economy—while taking sensible, cost-effective, evidence-based steps to protect public health and welfare,” Cass Sunstein, administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, said in a separate Journal op-ed on Tuesday. In other words, the administration isn’t going to change its broad goals such as reducing carbon emissions and protecting consumers from financial abuses.

The White House has estimated that nearly a dozen of the changes will save businesses around $10 billion over five years, The Journal reported. Smaller initiatives will also add to the savings.

Sunstein added that Chief of Staff William Daley asked the Cabinet to prioritize regulatory actions that would boost economic growth and job creation going forward. “Today's plans explicitly recognize that the regulatory look-back is not a one-time endeavor. Agencies will continue to revisit existing rules, asking whether they should be updated, streamlined, or repealed,” he wrote.

This is the first time a review of regulations has been directed by the White House, rather than Congress, Kovacs said. Tuesday’s announcement is the result of a review mandated by executive order in January.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content

 

Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »