NATIONAL SECURITY

Boehner Says Pakistan Relationship Critical

Updated: May 3, 2011 | 10:13 p.m.
May 3, 2011 | 4:24 p.m.

House Speaker John Boehner

House Speaker John Boehner said on Tuesday that the U.S. relationship with Pakistan is “critical to breaking the back of al-Qaida” and called for a closer relationship with Islamabad.

Brushing aside much of the criticism heaped on the Pakistanis after the killing of Osama bin Laden, Boehner said Pakistan was a critical ally.

“We both benefit from having a strong bilateral relationship. This is not a time to back away from Pakistan,” Boehner said. “We need more engagement, not less.”

Boehner made the remarks to a handful of reporters in his Capitol office following a congressional visit to Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Belgium.


TOP STORIES:
WITH BIN LADEN DEAD, TIME TO LEAVE?


Insiders from Both Parties Give Obama High Marks

PICTURES: U.S. Photos of bin Laden's Compound

PICTURES: World Reacts to the Death of Osama bin Laden

VOICES: For U.S. Youth, the Story of Our Lives

More bin Laden Coverage >>

After U.S. forces killed bin Laden in Pakistan on Sunday, Islamabad came under intense criticism for allowing the al-Qaida leader to live undetected for many years within its borders. Boehner urged perspective. “It is important for the U.S. to look Pakistan in the eye and come to a real understanding on where they are. Our engagement needs to be robust. We need to have an eyeball-to-eyeball conversation about where this relationship is going.”

The speaker dismissed any talk of reduced foreign aid to the Pakistanis: “It's premature” to discuss cutting or eliminating aid to Pakistan. He called the relationship “critical” to U.S. national security—saying success in Afghanistan is linked directly to cooperation from Pakistan. “They have been helpful. They have lost more troops than we have.”

Boehner said the $20 billion in U.S. aid to Pakistan since 9/11 “has been worth it. Is it expensive? Yes.”

Boehner also said he would support a “residual force” in Iraq after the December 31 withdrawal date. “There are clearly gaps in the security there. It would be a shame to take a risk and let that investment be jeopardized.”

Boehner said a request for a prolonged U.S. military presence in Iraq after December 31 is inevitable. “It is as plain as day. It’s as clear as the blue sky. And if they ask we should be willing to work with them.”

Boehner would not say how large U.S. forces should stay there.

Want the news first every morning? Sign up for National Journal’s Need-to-Know Memo. Short items to prepare you for the day.

 

Want to stay ahead of the curve? Sign up for National Journal’s AM & PM Must Reads. News and analysis to ensure you don’t miss a thing.

Leave a Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
  • NationalJournal on Twitter
  • NationalJournal on Facebook
  • NationalJournal on Tumblr
  • NationalJournal's RSS Feeds
  • NationalJournal's Email Newsletters
  • NationalJournal on iPhone and iPad
Popular Galleries

Jim Morin's Animated World -- PICTURES

QUIZ: Guess the State Capitol

National Journal Email Alerts

Stay ahead of the curve with these alerts.
Learn more.

Expert Opinions
Education Experts

The College-to-Jobs Link, Or Lack Thereof

7:13 a.m.

Latest Response by Michelle Asha Cooper: What’s That Degree Really Worth?

Transportation Experts

Not Waiting for the Feds

6:28 p.m.

Latest Response by Emil H. Frankel: Defining and Allocating Roles

Health Care Experts

What Can Congress Learn from the FDA User Fee Bills?

5:59 p.m.

Latest Response by John Castellani: PDUFA: Resounding Success

More Expert Opinions »