Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

SOPA Critics Cry Foul Over IP Attache bill SOPA Critics Cry Foul Over IP Attache bill

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation

 

Tech

SOPA Critics Cry Foul Over IP Attache bill

July 11, 2012

A seemingly innocuous intellectual property bill has some critics of the controversial anti-piracy legislation known as the Stop Online Piracy Act crying foul.

The issue relates to draft legislation that the House Judiciary Committee put on its agenda for a markup Tuesday -- but did not get to -- that aims to improve the intellectual property attaché program. The program was created in 2006 to promote intellectual property protection and enforcement abroad.The draft bill would reorganization the program's structure and put it directly under the control of the Patent and Trademark Office.

Public Knowledge, one of many public interest and tech groups that opposed SOPA, wrote House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, on Tuesday to voice concerns with the draft bill, a version of which was included in SOPA.

SOPA and a similar Senate bill, which were focused on curbing piracy and counterfeiting on foreign websites, were derailed in January after facing massive protests from tech groups, Internet activists and others who claimed the legislation would hamper innovation and free speech on the Internet.

"Five months ago Public Knowledge joined with more than 70 groups representing a variety of participants in the Internet ecosystem in calling for a more open, transparent and deliberative process on bills dealing with intellectual property policy. The current approach to the Intellectual Property Attache Act fails to meet that standard," Public Knowledge President Gigi Sohn wrote. "Moreover, the legislation appears to approach intellectual property from an enforcement only approach while ignoring the need to promote limitations and excepts in copyright."

House Judiciary, which has generally steered clear of moving most tech-related legislation since the SOPA debacle, defended the process used in considering the draft IP attaché measure.

The panel has sought feedback on the draft since releasing it and plans to release a revised draft that includes changes based on that input before marking up the bill, according to a committee aide.

LIKE THIS STORY? Sign up for Tech Edge

Sign up for our daily newsletter and stay on top of tech coverage.

Sign up form for Tech Edge
Job Board
Search Jobs
Professional Development Program Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Farmington Hills, MI
Biomedical Service Internship Position
American Society of Civil Engineers | Flint, MI
Deputy Director of Transit Operations
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Jose, CA
Structural Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | New Haven, CT
Transportation Planner
American Society of Civil Engineers | Salinas, CA
Assessment and Remediation Team Lead
American Society of Civil Engineers | Regina, SK
Quality Systems Manager
American Society of Civil Engineers | Greensboro, NC
Quality Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Attica, IN
Senior Water Resource Project Manager
American Society of Civil Engineers | Fairfax, VA
Civil Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Steamboat Springs, CO
Entry Level Geotechnical Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Albany, NY
Sales Engineer-Process Automation/Instrumentation
American Society of Civil Engineers
Senior Project Manager- Transportation
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Antonio, TX
Materials Engineer 2
American Society of Civil Engineers | IL
Land Surveyor
American Society of Civil Engineers
Comments
comments powered by Disqus