The advocacy and public policy group Greenlining Institute objected to the proposed AT&T and T-Mobile merger in California Wednesday, saying it would hurt competition and eliminate jobs.
The California-based group, which has also opposed the merger in filings with the Federal Communications Commission, asked the California Public Utilities Commission to require more information from AT&T.
"The merger would harm competition in the retail value-conscious wireless services market; low-income and other value-conscious consumers would face increased prices and degraded quality of service," Greenlining says in its filing, available here.
"The merger would also harm competition in wholesale markets; the elimination of T-Mobile as the dominant value-conscious provider would give AT&T the incentive and ability to engage in anticompetitive conduct in the backhaul and roaming markets."
The proposed deal would make AT&T the No. 1 wireless provider in the U.S. market.
"In a world where wireless access is a necessity, the potential loss of T-Mobile's low-cost service presents a real threat to millions of low and moderate income Californians," Greenlining Institute General Counsel Samuel Kang said in a statement. "As it now stands, AT&T's purchase of T-Mobile will be bad news for our communities."
DON'T MISS TODAY'S TOP STORIES
Chock full of usable information on today's issues."
Michael, Executive Director
Concise coverage of everything I wish I had hours to read about."
Chuck, Graduate Student
The day's action in one quick read."
Stacy , Director of Communications
Great way to keep up with Washington"
Ray, Professor of Economics