America's Crumbling Foundation And The People Who Might Fix It

A Downside to Trustful Communities

High-trust communities have their downsides. There tends to be more trust in homogenous, economically stable communities -- a vision of America that doesn't reflect the diversity and dynamism seen as a valuable, even necessary, ingredient for growth.

Contrast a mid-size city like Muncie, Indiana, with a major city, like Los Angeles. In big cities, people are more likely to live alone, to be transient residents, and to be exposed to a wide variety of belief systems. Cities tend to have more economic inequality, and social trust tends to be lower. But big cities also have higher rates of innovation and job creation, according to Richard Florida, author of 'The Rise of the Creative Class' (and editor of our sister site, Atlantic Cities). Florida has pinpointed two characteristics of a place that are associated with innovation: diverse friendships and protest politics.

Four in five Americans live in one of the nation's 366 metropolitan areas, according to the 2010 Census. About one in ten Americans lives in either the New York or Los Angeles metro area. As major urban areas grow, what might this mean for our institutions? How can our institutions adapt to serve a fast-changing, fast-moving, diverse world?


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
About Restoration Calls

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, in his first inaugural address, told a country struggling under the weight of the Great Depression that the nation needed to take action to rebuild and rejuvenate itself. He said: "Restoration calls, however, not for changes in ethics alone. This Nation asks for action, and action now." It was a time not unlike our own, where misbehavior on Wall Street fed a widespread credit and confidence crisis that swept like a tornado through the U.S. and global economy. And as in 1933, Washington again faces the time-sensitive task of diagnosing how its institutions are ill-equipped to fix the nation's problems, and then building a new system responsive to America's new needs. This project will tell that story, through the eyes of the Americans affected.

Introduction to this series >>