Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

What Congress Faces on Defense in the Lame Duck What Congress Faces on Defense in the Lame Duck

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation

 

Blogs / Power

What Congress Faces on Defense in the Lame Duck

Aerial photograph of the Pentagon in Arlington, Va., on Sept. 26, 2003.  DoD photo by Tech. Sgt. Andy Dunaway, U.S. Air Force. (DoD photo by Tech. Sgt. Andy Dunaway, U.S. Air Force)

October 1, 2012

Our colleagues report for National Journal subscribers on sequestration and the Defense Department--and what we could see from Congress during the lame duck.

It seems as if some Democrats and Republicans are beginning to see eye to eye on an approach to halting the $55 billion set to take effect next year.

Sara Sorcher explains:

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., has said he is looking for a four-month "mini Simpson-Bowles" deal that could include additional spending cuts (including defense) and new revenues, to provide "some confidence" to strike a grand bargain to reduce the deficit down the road. Even Democrats appear to be warming up to the idea of a short-term deal, as House Budget Committee ranking member Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., said he also wants to find "some kind of agreement" to achieve deficit-reduction goals for six months and avert the across-the-board cuts that way.

But wait there's more. If the sequestration cuts do go into effect, some contractors would potentially have to give notice to thousands of employees. Democratic appropriators have said it's not necessary to needlessly worry thousands of employees without knowing which programs would be affected if sequestration happens. What does this mean for contractors and for members of Congress? Here's Sorcher again:

One way or another, companies will have to make a decision on how they interpret the law. If notices are sent this fall -- late October for most states -- lawmakers are likely to start hearing more from their constituents who would have tangible, personalized warning about how sequestration could directly affect them.

 

Subscribers can read more here.

More Blogs
Job Board
Search Jobs
Transportation Planner
American Society of Civil Engineers | Salinas, CA
Biomedical Service Internship Position
American Society of Civil Engineers | Flint, MI
Fire Sprinkler Inspector
American Society of Civil Engineers | Charlotte, NC
Deputy Director of Transit Operations
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Jose, CA
Structural Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | New Haven, CT
Assessment and Remediation Team Lead
American Society of Civil Engineers | Regina, SK
Professional Development Program Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Farmington Hills, MI
Assistant Professor - Water Resources/Ecological Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Auburn, AL
Quality Systems Manager
American Society of Civil Engineers | Greensboro, NC
Rail Field Construction Inspector
American Society of Civil Engineers | Jacksonville, FL
Manager, Quality Assurance
American Society of Civil Engineers | Memphis, TN
Sr. Controls Systems Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Grand Island, NE
Quality Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Attica, IN
Civil Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Steamboat Springs, CO
Commissioning Intern
American Society of Civil Engineers | Chicago, IL
Comments
comments powered by Disqus