Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Building, Environmental Groups Back Snowe Tax Bill Building, Environmental Groups Back Snowe Tax Bill

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation

 

Blogs / Influence

Building, Environmental Groups Back Snowe Tax Bill

September 28, 2012
A coalition of real estate and environment groups are backing a tax code bill introduced by Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, that would reform a tax deduction that rewards energy efficiency with the hope of making it easier for builders to use it.

The bill would also extend the current tax deduction through 2016. It's set to expire at the end of 2013, through 2016.

The Real Estate Roundtable, the Natural Resources Defense Council and the U.S. Green Building Council are all throwing their support behind the bill. Their argument for it: it's cumbersome for builders to apply the current code, which means that it's only really being used for partial building upgrades, not full-on retrofiring of whole buildings.

The bill is also cosponsored by Democratic Sens. Jeff Bingaman, Ben Cardin and Dianne Feinstein, and has been referred to the Senate Finance Committee. Snowe is a senior member on the committee, and introduced the bill before the Senate went into recess.

The industry groups, just like the lawmakers, are pitching it as a jobs bill (as is nearly every other bill being offered up this session). They cite an analysis conducted by the three groups that claims reforming the tax code would generate thousands of construction and manufacturing jobs.

"By making commonsense reforms to the existing 179D tax deduction, we will help encourage energy savings, create good-paying jobs in the construction industry, and reduce energy bills for American consumers," Snowe said in a statement.

The coalition of groups has a sizable Hill presence. RER has spent $2.16 million on lobbying thus far this year, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics. NRDC has spent $243,431 and USGBC has spent $180,000.
More Blogs
Job Board
Search Jobs
Biomedical Service Internship Position
American Society of Civil Engineers | Flint, MI
Fire Sprinkler Inspector
American Society of Civil Engineers | Charlotte, NC
Professional Development Program Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Farmington Hills, MI
Deputy Director of Transit Operations
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Jose, CA
Transportation Planner
American Society of Civil Engineers | Salinas, CA
Assistant Professor - Water Resources/Ecological Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Auburn, AL
Product Manager - Chemical Development and Supply - Tulsa, OK
American Society of Civil Engineers | Tulsa, OK
Commissioning Intern
American Society of Civil Engineers | Chicago, IL
Assessment and Remediation Team Lead
American Society of Civil Engineers | Regina, SK
Business Development Manager
American Society of Civil Engineers
Sr. Controls Systems Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Grand Island, NE
Senior Project Manager- Transportation
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Antonio, TX
Materials Engineer 2
American Society of Civil Engineers | IL
Land Surveyor
American Society of Civil Engineers
Quality Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Attica, IN
Comments
comments powered by Disqus