Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Not Easy Being Green: Chemical Industry Lobbying On New Building Standards Not Easy Being Green: Chemical Industry Lobbying On New Building Stand...

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation

 

Blogs / Influence

Not Easy Being Green: Chemical Industry Lobbying On New Building Standards

June 25, 2012
A proposed set of green building standards has set off alarms within the chemistry and plastics industry, which is lobbying to get the U.S. General Services Administration to reconsider adopting the new rules.

One of the most commonly used green building rating standards is the U.S. Green Building Council's system, LEED--or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. Many entities use LEED, including GSA. But the new set of rules on the table discourage the use of certain chemicals and plastics in construction.

More specifically, the proposed LEED standards include three different credits given to builders for not using certain plastics and chemicals, such as polyvinyl chloride, or PVC. The American Chemistry Council's Keith Christman, managing director of plastic markets, said these chemicals are needed for materials that improve the energy efficiency of buildings.

"This casts a shadow on products essential to providing energy efficiency," Christman told the Alley. "We're strongly supportive of energy efficiency. This isn't about us against USGBC, it's about us against these three credits."

The ACC, along with dozens of other trade groups and associations representing everything from building materials to the plastics industry, have been pushing lawmakers on the issue. In May, 56 members of Congress sent a letter to GSA pushing the agency to reconsider going with LEED if it contains the chemical credits.

ACC spent a total of $2.2 million in lobbying so far this year.

It looks like ACC and others in the industry have some time to continue pushing their cause. The USGBC, which was supposed to finalize the new standards in June, pushed back deciding on the new standards until 2013, a move that came "in response to a growing outcry from architects and other building industry professionals."
More Blogs
Job Board
Search Jobs
Digital and Content Manager, E4C
American Society of Civil Engineers | New York, NY
PRODUCT REVIEW ENGINEER
American Society of Civil Engineers | CA
Neighborhood Traffic Safety Services Intern
American Society of Civil Engineers | Bellevue, WA
United Technologies Research Fellow
American Society of Civil Engineers | New York, NY
Process Engineering Co-op
American Society of Civil Engineers | Conshohocken, PA
Electrical Engineer Co-op
American Society of Civil Engineers | Findlay, OH
Application Engineer/Developer INTERN - Complex Fluids
American Society of Civil Engineers | Brisbane, CA
Application Engineer - Internships CAE/CFD Metro Detroit
American Society of Civil Engineers | Livonia, MI
Chief Geoscientist
American Society of Civil Engineers
Application Engineer - Internships CAE/CFD Metro Boston
American Society of Civil Engineers | Burlington, MA
Professional Development Program Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Farmington Hills, MI
Civil Enginering Intern - Water/Wastewater/Site-Development
American Society of Civil Engineers | Sacramento, CA
Staff Accountant
American Society of Civil Engineers | Englewood, CO
Biomedical Service Internship Position
American Society of Civil Engineers | Flint, MI
Comments
comments powered by Disqus